2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparability research on blood glucose results among different kinds of detection systems

Junhua Zhuang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the comparability of blood glucose(Glu)results with different detection systems.Methods Six different kinds of biochemistry detection systems were used to detect plasma Glu concentrations at 2 levels of Randox quality controls and 48 clinical plasma according to EP9-A file.The collected data were treated with statistical analysis.Results Analysis of variance showed Glu results from different control and patients plasma had significant difference between various detection systems (P0.001).The correlation coefficiency of each detection system was above 0.975 and their reliability coefficiency was 0.999 3.The CV value of all detection systems did not excell T± 3.3% by precise assessment.Target system l was regarded as standard detection system and evaluated the acceptability of other detection systems.As a result,all detection systems except detection system 2 and detection system 3 did not excel T±5% according to clinical assessment.Conclusion The precision of Glu results in the 6 kinds of detection systems accords with clinical requirement.However,incomparability exists in the evaluation of clinical acceptability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the comparability of blood glucose(Glu)results with different detection systems.Methods Six different kinds of biochemistry detection systems were used to detect plasma Glu concentrations at 2 levels of Randox quality controls and 48 clinical plasma according to EP9-A file.The collected data were treated with statistical analysis.Results Analysis of variance showed Glu results from different control and patients plasma had significant difference between various detection systems (P0.001).The correlation coefficiency of each detection system was above 0.975 and their reliability coefficiency was 0.999 3.The CV value of all detection systems did not excell T± 3.3% by precise assessment.Target system l was regarded as standard detection system and evaluated the acceptability of other detection systems.As a result,all detection systems except detection system 2 and detection system 3 did not excel T±5% according to clinical assessment.Conclusion The precision of Glu results in the 6 kinds of detection systems accords with clinical requirement.However,incomparability exists in the evaluation of clinical acceptability.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the comparability of blood glucose(Glu)results with different detection systems.Methods Six different kinds of biochemistry detection systems were used to detect plasma Glu concentrations at 2 levels of Randox quality controls and 48 clinical plasma according to EP9-A file.The collected data were treated with statistical analysis.Results Analysis of variance showed Glu results from different control and patients plasma had significant difference between various detection systems (P0.001).The correlation coefficiency of each detection system was above 0.975 and their reliability coefficiency was 0.999 3.The CV value of all detection systems did not excell T± 3.3% by precise assessment.Target system l was regarded as standard detection system and evaluated the acceptability of other detection systems.As a result,all detection systems except detection system 2 and detection system 3 did not excel T±5% according to clinical assessment.Conclusion The precision of Glu results in the 6 kinds of detection systems accords with clinical requirement.However,incomparability exists in the evaluation of clinical acceptability.

Key concepts: Comparability, Reliability (semiconductor), Computer science, Chromatography, Statistics, Mathematics, Chemistry, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparability research on blood glucose results among different kinds of detection systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens