2003Chinese Journal of Hospital PharmacyRequires access

Studies on pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of naproxen

Li Zhao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of two dosageforms of naproxen. METHODS Single oral dose of naproxen particles and capsule were given to 18 volunteers in an open randomized crossover way to study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability, naproxen concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of test and control formulations were as follows: T max ( 1.1 ± 0.6 ) and ( 1.3 ± 0.8 )h; C max ( 36.1 ± 7.6 ) and ( 40.6 ± 8.9 ) mg·L -1 ; t 1/2 ( 15.9 ± 2.5 ) and ( 15.5 ± 2.2 )h; AUC 0~t ( 499.6 ± 118.2 ) and ( 539.9 ± 126.9 ) mg·h·L -1 ; AUC 0→∞ ( 559.5 ± 132.4 ) and ( 667.2 ± 155.6 ) mg·h·L -1 . The relative bioavailability of test formulation was ( 94.8 ± 13.1 )%. The result of statistical analysis on above parameters showed that there was no significant difference between two formulations. CONCLUSIONS The two formulations were bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of two dosageforms of naproxen. METHODS Single oral dose of naproxen particles and capsule were given to 18 volunteers in an open randomized crossover way to study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability, naproxen concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of test and control formulations were as follows: T max ( 1.1 ± 0.6 ) and ( 1.3 ± 0.8 )h; C max ( 36.1 ± 7.6 ) and ( 40.6 ± 8.9 ) mg·L -1 ; t 1/2 ( 15.9 ± 2.5 ) and ( 15.5 ± 2.2 )h; AUC 0~t ( 499.6 ± 118.2 ) and ( 539.9 ± 126.9 ) mg·h·L -1 ; AUC 0→∞ ( 559.5 ± 132.4 ) and ( 667.2 ± 155.6 ) mg·h·L -1 . The relative bioavailability of test formulation was ( 94.8 ± 13.1 )%. The result of statistical analysis on above parameters showed that there was no significant difference between two formulations. CONCLUSIONS The two formulations were bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the bioequivalence of two dosageforms of naproxen. METHODS Single oral dose of naproxen particles and capsule were given to 18 volunteers in an open randomized crossover way to study the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability, naproxen concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of test and control formulations were as follows: T max ( 1.1 ± 0.6 ) and ( 1.3 ± 0.8 )h; C max ( 36.1 ± 7.6 ) and ( 40.6 ± 8.9 ) mg·L -1 ; t 1/2 ( 15.9 ± 2.5 ) and ( 15.5 ± 2.2 )h; AUC 0~t ( 499.6 ± 118.2 ) and ( 539.9 ± 126.9 ) mg·h·L -1 ; AUC 0→∞ ( 559.5 ± 132.4 ) and ( 667.2 ± 155.6 ) mg·h·L -1 . The relative bioavailability of test formulation was ( 94.8 ± 13.1 )%. The result of statistical analysis on above parameters showed that there was no significant difference between two formulations. CONCLUSIONS The two formulations were bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Naproxen, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, Plasma concentration, Pharmacology, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of naproxen — Research Paper | ScholarLens