ScholarLens Back to search
2011•Journal of laparoscopic surgeryRequires access

The clinical research of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Weihua Cheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the effectiveness of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.Methods:One hundred and two patients with cholecystolithiasis choledocholithiasis were randomly divided into three groups,group A:laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LC+LCBDE),group B:cholecystoctomy and common bile duct exploration under laparotomy(OC+OCBDE),group C:LC and endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+EST).Then the operative time,blood loss,pain score,time for resumption of intestinal function,incidence of postoperative complications,the time for returning to work after surgery,duration of T-tube and the average time in hospital among 3 groups were compared.Results:Group A was significantly superior to group B and C.Conclusions:LC and LCBDE is safe and feasible.Furthermore,it is minimally invasive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the effectiveness of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.Methods:One hundred and two patients with cholecystolithiasis choledocholithiasis were randomly divided into three groups,group A:laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LC+LCBDE),group B:cholecystoctomy and common bile duct exploration under laparotomy(OC+OCBDE),group C:LC and endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+EST).Then the operative time,blood loss,pain score,time for resumption of intestinal function,incidence of postoperative complications,the time for returning to work after surgery,duration of T-tube and the average time in hospital among 3 groups were compared.Results:Group A was significantly superior to group B and C.Conclusions:LC and LCBDE is safe and feasible.Furthermore,it is minimally invasive.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the effectiveness of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis.Methods:One hundred and two patients with cholecystolithiasis choledocholithiasis were randomly divided into three groups,group A:laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LC+LCBDE),group B:cholecystoctomy and common bile duct exploration under laparotomy(OC+OCBDE),group C:LC and endoscopic sphincterotomy(LC+EST).Then the operative time,blood loss,pain score,time for resumption of intestinal function,incidence of postoperative complications,the time for returning to work after surgery,duration of T-tube and the average time in hospital among 3 groups were compared.Results:Group A was significantly superior to group B and C.Conclusions:LC and LCBDE is safe and feasible.Furthermore,it is minimally invasive.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparotomy, Cholecystectomy, Surgery, Blood loss, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Laparoscopy, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical research of three different kinds of operation in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens