2008•Zhonghua putong waike zazhiRequires access

Comparation of two types of minimal invasive surgery for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Hongbing Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) combined with bile duct exploration and stone removal(BDE) and LC with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) in treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.Methods Among 256 cases of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithlasis,132 patients were treated by LC+LCBDE,and 124 cases by EST combined with LC.The operation success rate,operation time and cost,complication rate,and length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared.Results There was no statistical difference in the operation success rate,complication rate,stone clearance rate,and average hospital stay between the two groups,but EST+LC group had significantly longer operation time and higher cost.Conclusions There are respective indications,advantages and disadvantages in the two groups.EST+LC is the better choice for patients with diameter of CBD1.0 cm,stones impacted in the distal CBD,or old age.Otherwise,for patients with diameter of CBD1.0cm and with multiple choledocholithiasis,especially for middle-aged patients,the better way is LC+LCBDE.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) combined with bile duct exploration and stone removal(BDE) and LC with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) in treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.Methods Among 256 cases of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithlasis,132 patients were treated by LC+LCBDE,and 124 cases by EST combined with LC.The operation success rate,operation time and cost,complication rate,and length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared.Results There was no statistical difference in the operation success rate,complication rate,stone clearance rate,and average hospital stay between the two groups,but EST+LC group had significantly longer operation time and higher cost.Conclusions There are respective indications,advantages and disadvantages in the two groups.EST+LC is the better choice for patients with diameter of CBD1.0 cm,stones impacted in the distal CBD,or old age.Otherwise,for patients with diameter of CBD1.0cm and with multiple choledocholithiasis,especially for middle-aged patients,the better way is LC+LCBDE.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) combined with bile duct exploration and stone removal(BDE) and LC with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) in treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.Methods Among 256 cases of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithlasis,132 patients were treated by LC+LCBDE,and 124 cases by EST combined with LC.The operation success rate,operation time and cost,complication rate,and length of hospital stay of the two groups were compared.Results There was no statistical difference in the operation success rate,complication rate,stone clearance rate,and average hospital stay between the two groups,but EST+LC group had significantly longer operation time and higher cost.Conclusions There are respective indications,advantages and disadvantages in the two groups.EST+LC is the better choice for patients with diameter of CBD1.0 cm,stones impacted in the distal CBD,or old age.Otherwise,for patients with diameter of CBD1.0cm and with multiple choledocholithiasis,especially for middle-aged patients,the better way is LC+LCBDE.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surgery, Gallstones, Complication, Cholecystectomy, Significant difference, Common bile duct stone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparation of two types of minimal invasive surgery for treating cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens