2009•China Journal of EndoscopyRequires access

Comparison between two cholecystectomies for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Jingyan Huang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

【Objective】To compare the effect between two kinds of cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.【Methods】From June 2006 to March 2008,86 cases with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were treated by cholecystectomy in our hospital,including 44 cases by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration with primary suture(group A),and 42 cases by endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy(group B).【Results】The average hospital stay and medication time after surgery in group A was shorter than those in group B(P 0.05).There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality after surgery between group A and group B.【Conclusions】The primary suture after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy could avoid the disturbance of biliary function and electrolyte imbalance,and it would be a safe and effective method for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

【Objective】To compare the effect between two kinds of cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.【Methods】From June 2006 to March 2008,86 cases with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were treated by cholecystectomy in our hospital,including 44 cases by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration with primary suture(group A),and 42 cases by endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy(group B).【Results】The average hospital stay and medication time after surgery in group A was shorter than those in group B(P 0.05).There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality after surgery between group A and group B.【Conclusions】The primary suture after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy could avoid the disturbance of biliary function and electrolyte imbalance,and it would be a safe and effective method for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

【Objective】To compare the effect between two kinds of cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis.【Methods】From June 2006 to March 2008,86 cases with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were treated by cholecystectomy in our hospital,including 44 cases by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration with primary suture(group A),and 42 cases by endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy(group B).【Results】The average hospital stay and medication time after surgery in group A was shorter than those in group B(P 0.05).There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality after surgery between group A and group B.【Conclusions】The primary suture after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy could avoid the disturbance of biliary function and electrolyte imbalance,and it would be a safe and effective method for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Key concepts: Medicine, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Common bile duct, Surgery, Fibrous joint, Gallstones, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between two cholecystectomies for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens