2002Journal of Zhengzhou UniversityRequires access

Several Questions about Penal Code Protection of Copyright

Di Ying

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Article 217 of penal law stipulates that four actions are infringement of copyright. As the scope of the object of the copyright the crime infringes doesn't extend, there exists vast defect in the crime, which often contradicts the copyright law. The scope of copyright the penal law protects is smaller than that of copyright law, in addition, the penal law pays attention to the protection of the property right of the copyright but neglects to protect the writer's body right. The necessary condition that takes making profit as the subjective purpose of that crime restricts the use of laws. There exists restricting relation between the prescription stipulated in penal law and the protection of copyright. With the issue of the copyright law, the design that constructs the crime of infringement of copyright has lagged behind, so it must be modified as soon as possible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Article 217 of penal law stipulates that four actions are infringement of copyright. As the scope of the object of the copyright the crime infringes doesn't extend, there exists vast defect in the crime, which often contradicts the copyright law. The scope of copyright the penal law protects is smaller than that of copyright law, in addition, the penal law pays attention to the protection of the property right of the copyright but neglects to protect the writer's body right. The necessary condition that takes making profit as the subjective purpose of that crime restricts the use of laws. There exists restricting relation between the prescription stipulated in penal law and the protection of copyright. With the issue of the copyright law, the design that constructs the crime of infringement of copyright has lagged behind, so it must be modified as soon as possible.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Article 217 of penal law stipulates that four actions are infringement of copyright. As the scope of the object of the copyright the crime infringes doesn't extend, there exists vast defect in the crime, which often contradicts the copyright law. The scope of copyright the penal law protects is smaller than that of copyright law, in addition, the penal law pays attention to the protection of the property right of the copyright but neglects to protect the writer's body right. The necessary condition that takes making profit as the subjective purpose of that crime restricts the use of laws. There exists restricting relation between the prescription stipulated in penal law and the protection of copyright. With the issue of the copyright law, the design that constructs the crime of infringement of copyright has lagged behind, so it must be modified as soon as possible.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Copyright law, Law, Criminal law, Common law copyright, Profit (economics), Law and economics, Copyright infringement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Several Questions about Penal Code Protection of Copyright — Research Paper | ScholarLens