2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

Clinical Significance of Liver Biopsy in Chronic Hepatic Disease Patients with Negative Serological Markers

Yisen Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinical significance of liver biopsy in chronic hepatic disease patients with negative serological markers. Methods: HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA were detected in 67 chronic hepatic disease patients with non A-E hepatitis. Liver specimens of all the cases were examined by immunohistochemistry for HBsAg, and HBcAg. Results: Serum HBV-DNA were lower than 1 × 104 copies/mL and HCV-RNA were negative in all cases. Among the 67 liver histological assays, HBsAg or HBcAg of 36 cases were positive. 11 cases were non-alcoholic fatty hepatitis, 9 cases were toxic liver injury, and 11 cases were cryptogenic hepatitis. Histological changes of 8 cases were liver cirrhosis including 5 HBV positive and 3 cryptogenic cases. Conclusion: The etiological of non A-E hepatitis patients is mostly HBV infection. Liver biopsy shows its important value in diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the clinical significance of liver biopsy in chronic hepatic disease patients with negative serological markers. Methods: HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA were detected in 67 chronic hepatic disease patients with non A-E hepatitis. Liver specimens of all the cases were examined by immunohistochemistry for HBsAg, and HBcAg. Results: Serum HBV-DNA were lower than 1 × 104 copies/mL and HCV-RNA were negative in all cases. Among the 67 liver histological assays, HBsAg or HBcAg of 36 cases were positive. 11 cases were non-alcoholic fatty hepatitis, 9 cases were toxic liver injury, and 11 cases were cryptogenic hepatitis. Histological changes of 8 cases were liver cirrhosis including 5 HBV positive and 3 cryptogenic cases. Conclusion: The etiological of non A-E hepatitis patients is mostly HBV infection. Liver biopsy shows its important value in diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the clinical significance of liver biopsy in chronic hepatic disease patients with negative serological markers. Methods: HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA were detected in 67 chronic hepatic disease patients with non A-E hepatitis. Liver specimens of all the cases were examined by immunohistochemistry for HBsAg, and HBcAg. Results: Serum HBV-DNA were lower than 1 × 104 copies/mL and HCV-RNA were negative in all cases. Among the 67 liver histological assays, HBsAg or HBcAg of 36 cases were positive. 11 cases were non-alcoholic fatty hepatitis, 9 cases were toxic liver injury, and 11 cases were cryptogenic hepatitis. Histological changes of 8 cases were liver cirrhosis including 5 HBV positive and 3 cryptogenic cases. Conclusion: The etiological of non A-E hepatitis patients is mostly HBV infection. Liver biopsy shows its important value in diagnosis.

Key concepts: HBcAg, Medicine, HBsAg, Liver biopsy, Serology, Cirrhosis, Gastroenterology, Chronic liver disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Significance of Liver Biopsy in Chronic Hepatic Disease Patients with Negative Serological Markers — Research Paper | ScholarLens