2009Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family PlanningRequires access

Induced Abortion and the Risk of Tubal Infertility

Liu Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between induced abortion and tubal infertility. Methods: Case control study (1∶2) was adopted. Infertile women with bilateral fallopian tube obstruction were selected in the case group, and two control groups were designed in this study: infertile women with bilateral tubal patency were enrolled in the infertile control group, while corresponding pregnant women in the pregnancy control group. Data were collected through face to face interviews with questionnaires, including demographic characteristics, histories of gynecology and obstetrics, operation, as well as contraception. And all data were analyzed using multivariate Logistic regression technique. Results: There was no evident correlation between induced abortion and tubal infertility, compared with the two control groups (the infertile control group: OR= 1.01, 95% CI 0.56 ~1.80; the pregnancy control group: OR =1.06, 95% CI 0.62 ~1.81). And the risk of tubal infertility increased with the following factors, acute PID, lower abdominal surgery, dysmenorrhea and pregnancy. Conclusions: Except for induced abortion, special attentions should be paid to the impact of long-term reproductive tract infection, especially the asymptomatic infections, in view of the current increasing trend of tubal infertility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To explore the relationship between induced abortion and tubal infertility. Methods: Case control study (1∶2) was adopted. Infertile women with bilateral fallopian tube obstruction were selected in the case group, and two control groups were designed in this study: infertile women with bilateral tubal patency were enrolled in the infertile control group, while corresponding pregnant women in the pregnancy control group. Data were collected through face to face interviews with questionnaires, including demographic characteristics, histories of gynecology and obstetrics, operation, as well as contraception. And all data were analyzed using multivariate Logistic regression technique. Results: There was no evident correlation between induced abortion and tubal infertility, compared with the two control groups (the infertile control group: OR= 1.01, 95% CI 0.56 ~1.80; the pregnancy control group: OR =1.06, 95% CI 0.62 ~1.81). And the risk of tubal infertility increased with the following factors, acute PID, lower abdominal surgery, dysmenorrhea and pregnancy. Conclusions: Except for induced abortion, special attentions should be paid to the impact of long-term reproductive tract infection, especially the asymptomatic infections, in view of the current increasing trend of tubal infertility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between induced abortion and tubal infertility. Methods: Case control study (1∶2) was adopted. Infertile women with bilateral fallopian tube obstruction were selected in the case group, and two control groups were designed in this study: infertile women with bilateral tubal patency were enrolled in the infertile control group, while corresponding pregnant women in the pregnancy control group. Data were collected through face to face interviews with questionnaires, including demographic characteristics, histories of gynecology and obstetrics, operation, as well as contraception. And all data were analyzed using multivariate Logistic regression technique. Results: There was no evident correlation between induced abortion and tubal infertility, compared with the two control groups (the infertile control group: OR= 1.01, 95% CI 0.56 ~1.80; the pregnancy control group: OR =1.06, 95% CI 0.62 ~1.81). And the risk of tubal infertility increased with the following factors, acute PID, lower abdominal surgery, dysmenorrhea and pregnancy. Conclusions: Except for induced abortion, special attentions should be paid to the impact of long-term reproductive tract infection, especially the asymptomatic infections, in view of the current increasing trend of tubal infertility.

Key concepts: Medicine, Obstetrics, Infertility, Gynecology, Abortion, Pregnancy, Logistic regression, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Induced Abortion and the Risk of Tubal Infertility — Research Paper | ScholarLens