2014Unpublished venueRequires access

A Study on the Succession of Rural Residential Land Use Right in Developed Area

Liu Hong-me

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Based on the comprehensive history of Chinese rural residential land system and its current policies, this paper reveals the connotation and essence of rural residential land use right and summarizes the inner conflicts of current national policies as well as variously local practices. Meanwhile, it analyses the necessity of rural residential land use right reform and proposes a succession system of rural residential land use right. Research methods include history analysis, documentary analysis and comparative analysis. The results indicate that current system intentionally blurs the succession of rural residential land, and also, internal contradictions occur in the legal system. Both of them suggest that it disaccords the trend of new-type urbanization. The conclusion is that current rural residential land system hardly benefit farmers' right of property, thus causes detriment practically. In order to ameliorate the system, the government should push forward the reform of domiciliary control system; on the other hand, the relation between collective membership and domiciliary identity should be cut. In this way, farmers' legal rights of rural residential land can be secured; hence, the urbanization would process more smoothly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on the comprehensive history of Chinese rural residential land system and its current policies, this paper reveals the connotation and essence of rural residential land use right and summarizes the inner conflicts of current national policies as well as variously local practices. Meanwhile, it analyses the necessity of rural residential land use right reform and proposes a succession system of rural residential land use right. Research methods include history analysis, documentary analysis and comparative analysis. The results indicate that current system intentionally blurs the succession of rural residential land, and also, internal contradictions occur in the legal system. Both of them suggest that it disaccords the trend of new-type urbanization. The conclusion is that current rural residential land system hardly benefit farmers' right of property, thus causes detriment practically. In order to ameliorate the system, the government should push forward the reform of domiciliary control system; on the other hand, the relation between collective membership and domiciliary identity should be cut. In this way, farmers' legal rights of rural residential land can be secured; hence, the urbanization would process more smoothly.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on the comprehensive history of Chinese rural residential land system and its current policies, this paper reveals the connotation and essence of rural residential land use right and summarizes the inner conflicts of current national policies as well as variously local practices. Meanwhile, it analyses the necessity of rural residential land use right reform and proposes a succession system of rural residential land use right. Research methods include history analysis, documentary analysis and comparative analysis. The results indicate that current system intentionally blurs the succession of rural residential land, and also, internal contradictions occur in the legal system. Both of them suggest that it disaccords the trend of new-type urbanization. The conclusion is that current rural residential land system hardly benefit farmers' right of property, thus causes detriment practically. In order to ameliorate the system, the government should push forward the reform of domiciliary control system; on the other hand, the relation between collective membership and domiciliary identity should be cut. In this way, farmers' legal rights of rural residential land can be secured; hence, the urbanization would process more smoothly.

Key concepts: Connotation, Urbanization, Property rights, Government (linguistics), Land use, Economic growth, Business, Land law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study on the Succession of Rural Residential Land Use Right in Developed Area — Research Paper | ScholarLens