2011Chinese Journal of EndourologyRequires access

Evaluation of MRI and MRU value in the diagnosis of ureter diseases

Zhuang Jian-pi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI and MRU in ureter diseases. Methods One hundred and forteen patients with ureter diseases supposed clinically were examined by MRI and MRU. All cases were confirmed by surgery, pathology or ureteroscopy. Results One hundred and forteen cases included congenital malformation (n=15), benign stricture (n=21), ureteral calculus (n=12), ureteral carcinoma (n=18), extrinsic lesion (n=24). The accuracy of the correct diagnosis with MRU was 81.6% (93/114). Combined with conventional MRI images, the accuracy of the correct diagnosis was 92.1% (105/114). Conclusion MRU is an effective modality in the evaluation of ureter diseases, especially for patients who have contraindication to intravenous pyelography(IVP) or suffer from renal dysfunction. A combination of conventional MRI images can increase the accuracy of the correct diagnosis in the ureter diseases.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI and MRU in ureter diseases. Methods One hundred and forteen patients with ureter diseases supposed clinically were examined by MRI and MRU. All cases were confirmed by surgery, pathology or ureteroscopy. Results One hundred and forteen cases included congenital malformation (n=15), benign stricture (n=21), ureteral calculus (n=12), ureteral carcinoma (n=18), extrinsic lesion (n=24). The accuracy of the correct diagnosis with MRU was 81.6% (93/114). Combined with conventional MRI images, the accuracy of the correct diagnosis was 92.1% (105/114). Conclusion MRU is an effective modality in the evaluation of ureter diseases, especially for patients who have contraindication to intravenous pyelography(IVP) or suffer from renal dysfunction. A combination of conventional MRI images can increase the accuracy of the correct diagnosis in the ureter diseases.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI and MRU in ureter diseases. Methods One hundred and forteen patients with ureter diseases supposed clinically were examined by MRI and MRU. All cases were confirmed by surgery, pathology or ureteroscopy. Results One hundred and forteen cases included congenital malformation (n=15), benign stricture (n=21), ureteral calculus (n=12), ureteral carcinoma (n=18), extrinsic lesion (n=24). The accuracy of the correct diagnosis with MRU was 81.6% (93/114). Combined with conventional MRI images, the accuracy of the correct diagnosis was 92.1% (105/114). Conclusion MRU is an effective modality in the evaluation of ureter diseases, especially for patients who have contraindication to intravenous pyelography(IVP) or suffer from renal dysfunction. A combination of conventional MRI images can increase the accuracy of the correct diagnosis in the ureter diseases.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ureter, Contraindication, Ureteroscopy, Radiology, Pyelogram, Magnetic resonance imaging, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of MRI and MRU value in the diagnosis of ureter diseases — Research Paper | ScholarLens