2005Journal of Hepatobiliary SurgeryRequires access

EVALUATION OF APACHEII AND RANSON SCORING SYSTEM IN SEVERE ACUTE PANCREATITIS.

Meng Xiang-ling

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the value of acute physiology,age and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)and Ranson scoring on predicting the severity and prognosis and indicating clincal agents of severe acute pancreatitis(SAP).Methods A total of 94 patients with SAP were analyzed with APACHEⅡand Ranson criteria retrospectively.Result According to APACHEⅡ scoring system,the group with organ dysfunction was significantly higher than the group without it(P0.05).The incidence of organ failure in high score group was more than that in low score group (P0.05).The APACHEⅡ score in death cases was higher than that in survival cases(P0.05).Obvious difference of mortality was showed between high score group and the low one(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in APACHEⅡ score(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between these two groups in operation rate(P0.05),and there was no significant difference bwtween these two groups in operation rate(P0.05).According to Ranson scoring system,there was no significant difference between organ dysfunction patients and negative one(P0.05).The Ranson score in survival cases was not different with death cases(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in Ranson score(P0.05).Conclusion The APACHEⅡ scoring system could be used as an important reference in evaluation the severity and prognosis of SAP,but the value of Ranson criteria is not stable.Neither of the two systems can indicate surgical agents independently.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the value of acute physiology,age and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)and Ranson scoring on predicting the severity and prognosis and indicating clincal agents of severe acute pancreatitis(SAP).Methods A total of 94 patients with SAP were analyzed with APACHEⅡand Ranson criteria retrospectively.Result According to APACHEⅡ scoring system,the group with organ dysfunction was significantly higher than the group without it(P0.05).The incidence of organ failure in high score group was more than that in low score group (P0.05).The APACHEⅡ score in death cases was higher than that in survival cases(P0.05).Obvious difference of mortality was showed between high score group and the low one(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in APACHEⅡ score(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between these two groups in operation rate(P0.05),and there was no significant difference bwtween these two groups in operation rate(P0.05).According to Ranson scoring system,there was no significant difference between organ dysfunction patients and negative one(P0.05).The Ranson score in survival cases was not different with death cases(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in Ranson score(P0.05).Conclusion The APACHEⅡ scoring system could be used as an important reference in evaluation the severity and prognosis of SAP,but the value of Ranson criteria is not stable.Neither of the two systems can indicate surgical agents independently.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the value of acute physiology,age and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)and Ranson scoring on predicting the severity and prognosis and indicating clincal agents of severe acute pancreatitis(SAP).Methods A total of 94 patients with SAP were analyzed with APACHEⅡand Ranson criteria retrospectively.Result According to APACHEⅡ scoring system,the group with organ dysfunction was significantly higher than the group without it(P0.05).The incidence of organ failure in high score group was more than that in low score group (P0.05).The APACHEⅡ score in death cases was higher than that in survival cases(P0.05).Obvious difference of mortality was showed between high score group and the low one(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in APACHEⅡ score(P0.05),and there was no significant difference between these two groups in operation rate(P0.05),and there was no significant difference bwtween these two groups in operation rate(P0.05).According to Ranson scoring system,there was no significant difference between organ dysfunction patients and negative one(P0.05).The Ranson score in survival cases was not different with death cases(P0.05).Patients treated with operation and conservatively showed no difference in Ranson score(P0.05).Conclusion The APACHEⅡ scoring system could be used as an important reference in evaluation the severity and prognosis of SAP,but the value of Ranson criteria is not stable.Neither of the two systems can indicate surgical agents independently.

Key concepts: Medicine, Acute pancreatitis, Scoring system, Significant difference, Incidence (geometry), APACHE II, Internal medicine, Pancreatitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION OF APACHEII AND RANSON SCORING SYSTEM IN SEVERE ACUTE PANCREATITIS. — Research Paper | ScholarLens