2013Xinxueguan kangfu yixue zazhiRequires access

Clinical value of intravascular ultrasound imaging on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions

Liu Yong-xin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To analyze application value of intravascular ultrasound imaging(IVUS)on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions.Methods:A total of 130patients were proved to be intermediate lesions by coronary angiography(CAG)from our hospital were prospectively studied,and they were randomly divided into CAG group(n=95,received CAG examination)and IVUS group(n=35,received IVUS after CAG).Quantifying coronary angiography(QCA)and IVUS quantitative analyses were used to measure difference in minimal lumen diameter,reference vessel diameter,stenotic rates of diameter and area between two groups,and incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)during admission and follow-up were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with CAG group,there were significant increase in coronary intimal caleification[8.4%(8/95)vs.28.6%(10/35)],stenotic rates of diameter[(43.97±6.53)%vs.(55.25±7.41)%]and area[(56.48±10.38)%vs.(69.87±9.97)%]in IVUS group(P0.05both),but there were no significant difference in minimal lumen diameter and reference vessel diameter between two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence rate of MACE during admission between two groups(P0.05),but that of IVUS group(2.86%)was significantly lower than that of CAG group(6.32%)since one month after follow-up started(P0.05).Conclusion:Intravascular ultrasound imaging can significantly increase detection rate of intermediate coronary lesion,better guide percutaneous coronary intervention,prevent complications and improve prognosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To analyze application value of intravascular ultrasound imaging(IVUS)on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions.Methods:A total of 130patients were proved to be intermediate lesions by coronary angiography(CAG)from our hospital were prospectively studied,and they were randomly divided into CAG group(n=95,received CAG examination)and IVUS group(n=35,received IVUS after CAG).Quantifying coronary angiography(QCA)and IVUS quantitative analyses were used to measure difference in minimal lumen diameter,reference vessel diameter,stenotic rates of diameter and area between two groups,and incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)during admission and follow-up were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with CAG group,there were significant increase in coronary intimal caleification[8.4%(8/95)vs.28.6%(10/35)],stenotic rates of diameter[(43.97±6.53)%vs.(55.25±7.41)%]and area[(56.48±10.38)%vs.(69.87±9.97)%]in IVUS group(P0.05both),but there were no significant difference in minimal lumen diameter and reference vessel diameter between two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence rate of MACE during admission between two groups(P0.05),but that of IVUS group(2.86%)was significantly lower than that of CAG group(6.32%)since one month after follow-up started(P0.05).Conclusion:Intravascular ultrasound imaging can significantly increase detection rate of intermediate coronary lesion,better guide percutaneous coronary intervention,prevent complications and improve prognosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To analyze application value of intravascular ultrasound imaging(IVUS)on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions.Methods:A total of 130patients were proved to be intermediate lesions by coronary angiography(CAG)from our hospital were prospectively studied,and they were randomly divided into CAG group(n=95,received CAG examination)and IVUS group(n=35,received IVUS after CAG).Quantifying coronary angiography(QCA)and IVUS quantitative analyses were used to measure difference in minimal lumen diameter,reference vessel diameter,stenotic rates of diameter and area between two groups,and incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)during admission and follow-up were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with CAG group,there were significant increase in coronary intimal caleification[8.4%(8/95)vs.28.6%(10/35)],stenotic rates of diameter[(43.97±6.53)%vs.(55.25±7.41)%]and area[(56.48±10.38)%vs.(69.87±9.97)%]in IVUS group(P0.05both),but there were no significant difference in minimal lumen diameter and reference vessel diameter between two groups(P0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence rate of MACE during admission between two groups(P0.05),but that of IVUS group(2.86%)was significantly lower than that of CAG group(6.32%)since one month after follow-up started(P0.05).Conclusion:Intravascular ultrasound imaging can significantly increase detection rate of intermediate coronary lesion,better guide percutaneous coronary intervention,prevent complications and improve prognosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intravascular ultrasound, Mace, Lumen (anatomy), Percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary angiography, Radiology, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical value of intravascular ultrasound imaging on guidance of interventional treatment for intermediate coronary lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens