Curative effect of photodynamic therapy for male urethra condyloma acuminatum
Zhong Hongl
Abstract
Zhong Hongl
Abstract
Objectives: To study the curative effect and nursing of photodynamic therapy for male urethra condyloma acuminatum. Methods: 63 cases of male urethral condyloma acuminatum that had been treated with photodynamic therapy were divided into the intervention group(32 cases) and control group(31 cases) according to the way of nursing care. The curative effect,adverse reactions and the recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. Results: The remission rate of the intervention group and control group was 93. 75% and 87. 10% respectively,without statistically significant difference(P 0. 05). A total of 4 cases had adverse reactions in the intervention group,which was significnatly lower than the control group of 9 cases(P 0. 05). There were 2 relapse cases in the intervention group(6. 67%),while 6 cases(22. 22%) in the control group; the difference was statistically significant(P 0. 05). Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy has good curative effect in the treatment of male genital warts,and systematic nursing intervention can reduce adverse reaction and recurrence rate.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objectives: To study the curative effect and nursing of photodynamic therapy for male urethra condyloma acuminatum. Methods: 63 cases of male urethral condyloma acuminatum that had been treated with photodynamic therapy were divided into the intervention group(32 cases) and control group(31 cases) according to the way of nursing care. The curative effect,adverse reactions and the recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. Results: The remission rate of the intervention group and control group was 93. 75% and 87. 10% respectively,without statistically significant difference(P 0. 05). A total of 4 cases had adverse reactions in the intervention group,which was significnatly lower than the control group of 9 cases(P 0. 05). There were 2 relapse cases in the intervention group(6. 67%),while 6 cases(22. 22%) in the control group; the difference was statistically significant(P 0. 05). Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy has good curative effect in the treatment of male genital warts,and systematic nursing intervention can reduce adverse reaction and recurrence rate.
Key concepts: Condyloma Acuminatum, Medicine, Photodynamic therapy, Adverse effect, Genital warts, Significant difference, Intervention (counseling), Urethra