2012Journal of Heilongjiang College of EducationRequires access

30 Years' Argument over the Arbitrariness of Linguistic Signs: Review and Reflection

Xu Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the publication of Course in General Linguistics(Chinese version) in 1980,the hypothesis of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs put forward by F.de Saussure has attracted a lot of attention from Chinese linguists.There remains two major disagreements on the hypothesis among the Chinese scholars: whether linguistic signs are arbitrary or motivated and whether arbitrariness is the first principle of linguistic signs.The argument over the arbitrariness of linguistic signs is in part due to the lack of correct and comprehensive understanding of the hypothesis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the publication of Course in General Linguistics(Chinese version) in 1980,the hypothesis of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs put forward by F.de Saussure has attracted a lot of attention from Chinese linguists.There remains two major disagreements on the hypothesis among the Chinese scholars: whether linguistic signs are arbitrary or motivated and whether arbitrariness is the first principle of linguistic signs.The argument over the arbitrariness of linguistic signs is in part due to the lack of correct and comprehensive understanding of the hypothesis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the publication of Course in General Linguistics(Chinese version) in 1980,the hypothesis of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs put forward by F.de Saussure has attracted a lot of attention from Chinese linguists.There remains two major disagreements on the hypothesis among the Chinese scholars: whether linguistic signs are arbitrary or motivated and whether arbitrariness is the first principle of linguistic signs.The argument over the arbitrariness of linguistic signs is in part due to the lack of correct and comprehensive understanding of the hypothesis.

Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Argument (complex analysis), Linguistics, Linguistic analysis, Theoretical linguistics, Epistemology, Philosophy, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
30 Years' Argument over the Arbitrariness of Linguistic Signs: Review and Reflection — Research Paper | ScholarLens