30 Years' Argument over the Arbitrariness of Linguistic Signs: Review and Reflection
Xu Yu
Abstract
Xu Yu
Abstract
Since the publication of Course in General Linguistics(Chinese version) in 1980,the hypothesis of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs put forward by F.de Saussure has attracted a lot of attention from Chinese linguists.There remains two major disagreements on the hypothesis among the Chinese scholars: whether linguistic signs are arbitrary or motivated and whether arbitrariness is the first principle of linguistic signs.The argument over the arbitrariness of linguistic signs is in part due to the lack of correct and comprehensive understanding of the hypothesis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Since the publication of Course in General Linguistics(Chinese version) in 1980,the hypothesis of the arbitrariness of linguistic signs put forward by F.de Saussure has attracted a lot of attention from Chinese linguists.There remains two major disagreements on the hypothesis among the Chinese scholars: whether linguistic signs are arbitrary or motivated and whether arbitrariness is the first principle of linguistic signs.The argument over the arbitrariness of linguistic signs is in part due to the lack of correct and comprehensive understanding of the hypothesis.
Key concepts: Arbitrariness, Argument (complex analysis), Linguistics, Linguistic analysis, Theoretical linguistics, Epistemology, Philosophy, Chemistry