2013•China Modern DoctorRequires access

The proximal femoral nail(PFNA) treatment method of the intertrochanteric

Changxing Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of proximal femoral nail(PFNA) treatment method of the in tertrochanteric fractures.Methods From May 2007 to December 2010,PFNA treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in 79 cases,the establishment of the observation group,outside the same period action force hip screw fixation(DHS) surgery in 79 patients as a control group,compared the efficacy and follow-up,was a different time hip function Harris score changes.Results All patients were followed up for 1.5 years,all fractures healed,and two sets of fracture healing time,compared the amount of bleeding,the difference was significant(P 0.05).According to the Harris hip score,the efficacy of the observation group was significantly better than the control group,the difference was statisti cally significant(P 0.05).The observation group and control group after 6 months and 12 months after surgery,1.5 years after hip function Harris scores compared with 3 months after surgery were significantly improved,and the obser vation group than in the control group increased by more obvious difference statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion PFNA treatment of intertrochanteric fractures,especially for the comminuted or the bone worse,has the advantages of less trauma,simple operation,less bleeding,reliable fixation,less bone loss.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the efficacy of proximal femoral nail(PFNA) treatment method of the in tertrochanteric fractures.Methods From May 2007 to December 2010,PFNA treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in 79 cases,the establishment of the observation group,outside the same period action force hip screw fixation(DHS) surgery in 79 patients as a control group,compared the efficacy and follow-up,was a different time hip function Harris score changes.Results All patients were followed up for 1.5 years,all fractures healed,and two sets of fracture healing time,compared the amount of bleeding,the difference was significant(P 0.05).According to the Harris hip score,the efficacy of the observation group was significantly better than the control group,the difference was statisti cally significant(P 0.05).The observation group and control group after 6 months and 12 months after surgery,1.5 years after hip function Harris scores compared with 3 months after surgery were significantly improved,and the obser vation group than in the control group increased by more obvious difference statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion PFNA treatment of intertrochanteric fractures,especially for the comminuted or the bone worse,has the advantages of less trauma,simple operation,less bleeding,reliable fixation,less bone loss.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of proximal femoral nail(PFNA) treatment method of the in tertrochanteric fractures.Methods From May 2007 to December 2010,PFNA treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in 79 cases,the establishment of the observation group,outside the same period action force hip screw fixation(DHS) surgery in 79 patients as a control group,compared the efficacy and follow-up,was a different time hip function Harris score changes.Results All patients were followed up for 1.5 years,all fractures healed,and two sets of fracture healing time,compared the amount of bleeding,the difference was significant(P 0.05).According to the Harris hip score,the efficacy of the observation group was significantly better than the control group,the difference was statisti cally significant(P 0.05).The observation group and control group after 6 months and 12 months after surgery,1.5 years after hip function Harris scores compared with 3 months after surgery were significantly improved,and the obser vation group than in the control group increased by more obvious difference statistically significant(P 0.05).Conclusion PFNA treatment of intertrochanteric fractures,especially for the comminuted or the bone worse,has the advantages of less trauma,simple operation,less bleeding,reliable fixation,less bone loss.

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Dynamic hip screw, Intertrochanteric fracture, Significant difference, Clinical efficacy, Fixation (population genetics), Bone healing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The proximal femoral nail(PFNA) treatment method of the intertrochanteric — Research Paper | ScholarLens