Efficacy comparison of PFNA with DHS in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
Xiao Xiaolan
Abstract
Xiao Xiaolan
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy difference of PFNA and with DHS treatment of intertrochanteric frac tures.Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture patients were selected surgical cases,30 cases PFNA fixation on setting up observation group and another selected 30 patients by DHS fixation asa control group.Results Compared with control group,the observation group had shorter surgery time,less blood loss,faster fracture healing time,the difference was significant(P 0.05).The complication rate of the control group was significantly higher than the observation group,the difference was significant(P 0.05).Efficacy reference to Harris function score,good rate of 90.0% of the observation group,good rate of 83.3% of the control group.Comparison of two groups,the difference was not significant(P 0.05).Conclusion PFNA fixation for intertrochanteric fractures with simple operation,shorter operative time,less trauma,less bleeding,can effectively improve the patient's hip function,should be popularized and applied.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the efficacy difference of PFNA and with DHS treatment of intertrochanteric frac tures.Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture patients were selected surgical cases,30 cases PFNA fixation on setting up observation group and another selected 30 patients by DHS fixation asa control group.Results Compared with control group,the observation group had shorter surgery time,less blood loss,faster fracture healing time,the difference was significant(P 0.05).The complication rate of the control group was significantly higher than the observation group,the difference was significant(P 0.05).Efficacy reference to Harris function score,good rate of 90.0% of the observation group,good rate of 83.3% of the control group.Comparison of two groups,the difference was not significant(P 0.05).Conclusion PFNA fixation for intertrochanteric fractures with simple operation,shorter operative time,less trauma,less bleeding,can effectively improve the patient's hip function,should be popularized and applied.
Key concepts: Medicine, Intertrochanteric fracture, Dynamic hip screw, Blood loss, Surgery, Significant difference, Fixation (population genetics), Bone healing