Clinical significance of serum nidogen-2 and carbohydrate antigen 125 in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma
Yan Chen, Ping Jin, Hong-xiu Zhang, Lan-sheng Yang, Ying Feng
Abstract
Yan Chen, Ping Jin, Hong-xiu Zhang, Lan-sheng Yang, Ying Feng
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of serum nidogen-2 and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. Methods: The serum levels of nidogen-2 and CA125 were determined by ELISA and chemiluminescent assay in 15 cases of normal ovary, 22 cases of ovarian serous cystadenoma, and 40 cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Results: Compared with the normal ovary and ovarian serous cystadenoma, the serum level of nidogen-2 was higher in cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (P <0.05). The difference of serum nidogen-2 level between the cases of normal ovary and ovarian serous cystadenoma was not significant. The cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma at Ⅲ-Ⅳ stages had a higher serum nidogen-2 level than those at Ⅰ-Ⅱ stages (P <0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both improved by combined detection of serum nidogen-2 and CA125. Conclusion: Serum nidogen-2 can be used as a new biomarker for ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2011.04.011
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of serum nidogen-2 and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. Methods: The serum levels of nidogen-2 and CA125 were determined by ELISA and chemiluminescent assay in 15 cases of normal ovary, 22 cases of ovarian serous cystadenoma, and 40 cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Results: Compared with the normal ovary and ovarian serous cystadenoma, the serum level of nidogen-2 was higher in cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (P <0.05). The difference of serum nidogen-2 level between the cases of normal ovary and ovarian serous cystadenoma was not significant. The cases of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma at Ⅲ-Ⅳ stages had a higher serum nidogen-2 level than those at Ⅰ-Ⅱ stages (P <0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both improved by combined detection of serum nidogen-2 and CA125. Conclusion: Serum nidogen-2 can be used as a new biomarker for ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. DOI:10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2011.04.011
Key concepts: Serous cystadenocarcinoma, Serous Cystadenoma, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous fluid, Clinical significance, Ovary, Medicine, Pathology