2007Shiyong fangshexue zazhiRequires access

The Value of Mammography and High-frequency Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Early Breast Carcinoma

Zhao-Xin Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the diagnostic value of mammography and high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma.Methods Sixty-five female patients with breast carcinoma were all confirmed by surgery and pathological examinations. All the patients were examined by the high-frequency ultrasound as well as mammography.Results The positive diagnostic rate,the display of tumor shadow and malignant microcalcification with high-frequency ultrasound and mammography were as follows :64.6%(42/65)and 46%(30/ 65),62%(40/65)and 20%(13/65),40%(26/65)and 20%(13/65)respectively. The difference was considered statistically significant(P0.05). The positive diagnostic rate of high-frequency ultrasound combined with mammography was 83% (54/ 65)。Conclusion High-frequency ultrasound is better than mammography in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma. The combination of two means can increase the positive diagnostic rate of the breast carcinoma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the diagnostic value of mammography and high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma.Methods Sixty-five female patients with breast carcinoma were all confirmed by surgery and pathological examinations. All the patients were examined by the high-frequency ultrasound as well as mammography.Results The positive diagnostic rate,the display of tumor shadow and malignant microcalcification with high-frequency ultrasound and mammography were as follows :64.6%(42/65)and 46%(30/ 65),62%(40/65)and 20%(13/65),40%(26/65)and 20%(13/65)respectively. The difference was considered statistically significant(P0.05). The positive diagnostic rate of high-frequency ultrasound combined with mammography was 83% (54/ 65)。Conclusion High-frequency ultrasound is better than mammography in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma. The combination of two means can increase the positive diagnostic rate of the breast carcinoma.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the diagnostic value of mammography and high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma.Methods Sixty-five female patients with breast carcinoma were all confirmed by surgery and pathological examinations. All the patients were examined by the high-frequency ultrasound as well as mammography.Results The positive diagnostic rate,the display of tumor shadow and malignant microcalcification with high-frequency ultrasound and mammography were as follows :64.6%(42/65)and 46%(30/ 65),62%(40/65)and 20%(13/65),40%(26/65)and 20%(13/65)respectively. The difference was considered statistically significant(P0.05). The positive diagnostic rate of high-frequency ultrasound combined with mammography was 83% (54/ 65)。Conclusion High-frequency ultrasound is better than mammography in diagnosis of early breast carcinoma. The combination of two means can increase the positive diagnostic rate of the breast carcinoma.

Key concepts: Medicine, Mammography, High frequency ultrasound, Radiology, Ultrasound, Breast carcinoma, Microcalcification, Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Value of Mammography and High-frequency Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Early Breast Carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens