[A clinical study of lobectomy with minimally invasive incision].
Dan-qing Fang, Pin-xian Peng, Cheng-quan Liao
Abstract
Dan-qing Fang, Pin-xian Peng, Cheng-quan Liao
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the application of small thoracic incision for lobectomy with effects comparable to that of conventional incision. METHODS: A total of 386 patients with lung tumors were prospectively randomized into thoracic small incision group (n=184; average length of incision, 12.7 cm) and standard thoracic incision group (control group, n=152). The incision length, operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, transfusion, hemostatic dosage, ambulation time, hospital stay and major complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All of the indices in small incision group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.01) except the operation time (P>0.05). No severe complications occurred in small incision group, and in 4 cases conventional thoracotomy was performed instead due to adhesion or giant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-sparing thoracic small incision can achieve excellent clinical result and has such advantages as less invasiveness, reduced bleeding volume, pain and hospital stay, less complications, and better postoperative appearance. This procedure meets the requirements of lobectomy and provides an alternative for routine lobectomy for pulmonary tumors.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To study the application of small thoracic incision for lobectomy with effects comparable to that of conventional incision. METHODS: A total of 386 patients with lung tumors were prospectively randomized into thoracic small incision group (n=184; average length of incision, 12.7 cm) and standard thoracic incision group (control group, n=152). The incision length, operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, transfusion, hemostatic dosage, ambulation time, hospital stay and major complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All of the indices in small incision group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.01) except the operation time (P>0.05). No severe complications occurred in small incision group, and in 4 cases conventional thoracotomy was performed instead due to adhesion or giant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-sparing thoracic small incision can achieve excellent clinical result and has such advantages as less invasiveness, reduced bleeding volume, pain and hospital stay, less complications, and better postoperative appearance. This procedure meets the requirements of lobectomy and provides an alternative for routine lobectomy for pulmonary tumors.
Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Thoracotomy, Surgical incision, Cardiothoracic surgery, Pneumonectomy, Anesthesia, Lung