2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Nosocomial Infection in Patients with Ventricular Hemorrhage Cured by Lateral Ventricle Drainage: An Analysis of 41 Cases

Kang Xiao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyse infection rate of ventricular hemorrhage after lateral ventricle drainage and evaluate the method and measure of precaution. METHODS Patients were divided into first and second groups according to the remaining time of drainage tube and into A and B groups according to drainage in one or two sides. After operation the infection condition of insert tube was observed and blood was cultivated regularly. RESULTS The infection rate in the first group was significantly shorter than that in the second one ( P 0.01), while it was no significantly difference between groups A and B (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS To remain drainage tube for one to two weeks is safer than for more than two weeks. The infection rate is higher in group with drainage in two sides than in one. In addition, it is obviously related to the patient′s body condition and immunity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE To analyse infection rate of ventricular hemorrhage after lateral ventricle drainage and evaluate the method and measure of precaution. METHODS Patients were divided into first and second groups according to the remaining time of drainage tube and into A and B groups according to drainage in one or two sides. After operation the infection condition of insert tube was observed and blood was cultivated regularly. RESULTS The infection rate in the first group was significantly shorter than that in the second one ( P 0.01), while it was no significantly difference between groups A and B (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS To remain drainage tube for one to two weeks is safer than for more than two weeks. The infection rate is higher in group with drainage in two sides than in one. In addition, it is obviously related to the patient′s body condition and immunity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyse infection rate of ventricular hemorrhage after lateral ventricle drainage and evaluate the method and measure of precaution. METHODS Patients were divided into first and second groups according to the remaining time of drainage tube and into A and B groups according to drainage in one or two sides. After operation the infection condition of insert tube was observed and blood was cultivated regularly. RESULTS The infection rate in the first group was significantly shorter than that in the second one ( P 0.01), while it was no significantly difference between groups A and B (P 0.05). CONCLUSIONS To remain drainage tube for one to two weeks is safer than for more than two weeks. The infection rate is higher in group with drainage in two sides than in one. In addition, it is obviously related to the patient′s body condition and immunity.

Key concepts: Ventricle, Drainage, Medicine, Infection rate, Surgery, Significant difference, Anesthesia, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nosocomial Infection in Patients with Ventricular Hemorrhage Cured by Lateral Ventricle Drainage: An Analysis of 41 Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens