2008Medical InformationRequires access

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Greenlight Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate vs Transurethral Resection of Prostate for the Treatment of Older Patient with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

GE Wei-jun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP) and transuretharal resection of prostate(TURP). Methods A total of 88 cases of BPH were divided into 2 groups;of them 44 cases underwent PVP and 44,TURP. The operative time,the length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,blood loss,IPSS,Qmax and complications were observed. Results Comparison between PVP group and TURP group included the following :Two groups were similar in the operating time(P0.05).Remarkable differences were found in length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,and intraoperative blood loss(P0.05). No significant differences were found in IPSS and Qmax (P0.05). Conclusions The PVP is safe and efficacious for older patients with BPH,with advantages of less blood loss,better tolerance and few complications .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP) and transuretharal resection of prostate(TURP). Methods A total of 88 cases of BPH were divided into 2 groups;of them 44 cases underwent PVP and 44,TURP. The operative time,the length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,blood loss,IPSS,Qmax and complications were observed. Results Comparison between PVP group and TURP group included the following :Two groups were similar in the operating time(P0.05).Remarkable differences were found in length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,and intraoperative blood loss(P0.05). No significant differences were found in IPSS and Qmax (P0.05). Conclusions The PVP is safe and efficacious for older patients with BPH,with advantages of less blood loss,better tolerance and few complications .

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP) and transuretharal resection of prostate(TURP). Methods A total of 88 cases of BPH were divided into 2 groups;of them 44 cases underwent PVP and 44,TURP. The operative time,the length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,blood loss,IPSS,Qmax and complications were observed. Results Comparison between PVP group and TURP group included the following :Two groups were similar in the operating time(P0.05).Remarkable differences were found in length of hospital stay after operation,catheterization time,and intraoperative blood loss(P0.05). No significant differences were found in IPSS and Qmax (P0.05). Conclusions The PVP is safe and efficacious for older patients with BPH,with advantages of less blood loss,better tolerance and few complications .

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood loss, Prostate, Urology, Hyperplasia, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Resection, Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Greenlight Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate vs Transurethral Resection of Prostate for the Treatment of Older Patient with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens