2008Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police ForcesRequires access

Comparative study of transurethral resection of prostate and photoselective vaporization of prostate in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Qiang Ma

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the recent effects of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP).Methods 122 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) were non-randomly divided into two groups and underwent PVP and TURP separately.Operative time,blood loss during operation,recent effect and complications of the two surgical methods were compared.Results IPSS,QOL,the mean Qmax and PVR were significantly improved,compared with preoperative data(P0.05).Average blood loss,indwelling catheterization time and short-term complication rate in PVP group were significant less than those in TURP group(P0.01).Conclusions The recent effects of TURP and PVP in treatment of BPH(60 g)are similar,but PVP has advantages of less bleeding,shorter catheterization time and fewer complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the recent effects of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP).Methods 122 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) were non-randomly divided into two groups and underwent PVP and TURP separately.Operative time,blood loss during operation,recent effect and complications of the two surgical methods were compared.Results IPSS,QOL,the mean Qmax and PVR were significantly improved,compared with preoperative data(P0.05).Average blood loss,indwelling catheterization time and short-term complication rate in PVP group were significant less than those in TURP group(P0.01).Conclusions The recent effects of TURP and PVP in treatment of BPH(60 g)are similar,but PVP has advantages of less bleeding,shorter catheterization time and fewer complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the recent effects of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP).Methods 122 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) were non-randomly divided into two groups and underwent PVP and TURP separately.Operative time,blood loss during operation,recent effect and complications of the two surgical methods were compared.Results IPSS,QOL,the mean Qmax and PVR were significantly improved,compared with preoperative data(P0.05).Average blood loss,indwelling catheterization time and short-term complication rate in PVP group were significant less than those in TURP group(P0.01).Conclusions The recent effects of TURP and PVP in treatment of BPH(60 g)are similar,but PVP has advantages of less bleeding,shorter catheterization time and fewer complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Prostate, Urology, Hyperplasia, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Blood loss, Resection, Complication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of transurethral resection of prostate and photoselective vaporization of prostate in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens