Clinical Study on Efficacy and Safety of Escit-alopram VS Citalopram in the Treatment of First-episode Geriatric Depression
Yu Xue
Abstract
Yu Xue
Abstract
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of Escit-alopram and Citalopram in the treatment of first-episode geriatric depression.Methods:68 patients with first-episode geriatric depression were randomly divided into group A(Escit-alopram) and group B(Citalopram) for 6 weeks' treatment.Hamilton Depression rating scale(HAMD 17),Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI) and Treatment Emergent symptom scale(TESS) were used to assess the efficacy and side effects respectively before treatment and after treatment 1、2、4、6 weekends.Results: The scores of HAMD 17 and CGI in the group A were lower than those in the group B in the end of 1、4、6 week,and there was significant difference between the two groups(t=2.18,2.77,3.2,P0.05或P0.01);Clinical efficacy was significant difference between both groups(x2=4.19,P0.05);There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between both groups(x2=0.15,P 0.05).Conclusions: In contrast with Citalopram,Escit-alopram has a better antidepressant effect with faster onset,better efficacy,higher safety and well tolerated,and can not only alleviate the symptoms significantly but also be used as first-line medicine for treating geriatric depression.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of Escit-alopram and Citalopram in the treatment of first-episode geriatric depression.Methods:68 patients with first-episode geriatric depression were randomly divided into group A(Escit-alopram) and group B(Citalopram) for 6 weeks' treatment.Hamilton Depression rating scale(HAMD 17),Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI) and Treatment Emergent symptom scale(TESS) were used to assess the efficacy and side effects respectively before treatment and after treatment 1、2、4、6 weekends.Results: The scores of HAMD 17 and CGI in the group A were lower than those in the group B in the end of 1、4、6 week,and there was significant difference between the two groups(t=2.18,2.77,3.2,P0.05或P0.01);Clinical efficacy was significant difference between both groups(x2=4.19,P0.05);There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between both groups(x2=0.15,P 0.05).Conclusions: In contrast with Citalopram,Escit-alopram has a better antidepressant effect with faster onset,better efficacy,higher safety and well tolerated,and can not only alleviate the symptoms significantly but also be used as first-line medicine for treating geriatric depression.
Key concepts: Hamd, Clinical Global Impression, Citalopram, Depression (economics), Rating scale, Clinical efficacy, Antidepressant, Internal medicine