2014Journal of Hohai UniversityRequires access

Construction diversion risk benefit sharing model based on water diversion and storage at upstream hydropower station

Liu Lia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In order to effectively balance the risks of upstream and downstream hydropower stations and the peak load dispatching hydropower station,and reasonably share their benefits,we considered the effects of flood regulation and the storage process of the upstream station as a cooperative risk benefit and used the least core method in cooperative games to establish a least core model of diversion risk benefit sharing under the conditions of the construction of cascade hydropower stations,in order to calculate the diversion risk benefit sharing quota. A case study shows that the sharing of the diversion system and the pumped storage hydropower station exhibited negative values due to the benefits from the water diversion and flood storage at the upstream station,which means that we need to compensate the upstream hydropower station. The sharing of expenses of all the three hydropower stations varied with the change of diversion standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to effectively balance the risks of upstream and downstream hydropower stations and the peak load dispatching hydropower station,and reasonably share their benefits,we considered the effects of flood regulation and the storage process of the upstream station as a cooperative risk benefit and used the least core method in cooperative games to establish a least core model of diversion risk benefit sharing under the conditions of the construction of cascade hydropower stations,in order to calculate the diversion risk benefit sharing quota. A case study shows that the sharing of the diversion system and the pumped storage hydropower station exhibited negative values due to the benefits from the water diversion and flood storage at the upstream station,which means that we need to compensate the upstream hydropower station. The sharing of expenses of all the three hydropower stations varied with the change of diversion standards.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to effectively balance the risks of upstream and downstream hydropower stations and the peak load dispatching hydropower station,and reasonably share their benefits,we considered the effects of flood regulation and the storage process of the upstream station as a cooperative risk benefit and used the least core method in cooperative games to establish a least core model of diversion risk benefit sharing under the conditions of the construction of cascade hydropower stations,in order to calculate the diversion risk benefit sharing quota. A case study shows that the sharing of the diversion system and the pumped storage hydropower station exhibited negative values due to the benefits from the water diversion and flood storage at the upstream station,which means that we need to compensate the upstream hydropower station. The sharing of expenses of all the three hydropower stations varied with the change of diversion standards.

Key concepts: Hydropower, Upstream (networking), Water diversion, Flood myth, Downstream (manufacturing), Environmental science, Water resource management, Water storage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Construction diversion risk benefit sharing model based on water diversion and storage at upstream hydropower station — Research Paper | ScholarLens