2003Di-san junyi daxue xuebaoRequires access

Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of desloratadine for treating allergic rhinitis

Yi Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods A total of 50 cases of chronic or acute allergic rhinitis confirmed clinically were randomized into control and experimental groups for double blind study. Scoring of clinical symptoms, examinations of the nasal cavity, blood and urine routine examination, functions of liver and kidney and electrocardiogram (ECG) were conducted on day 14 before and after the experiment. The collected data were analyzed statistically. Results The clinical data of the two groups were comparable. The effective rate of desloratadine was significant in allergic rhinitis, being 95.45%. No remarkable adverse effect was noted in this experiment. Conclusion Desloratadine is more effective and safe than loratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and it may be feasible for clinical application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods A total of 50 cases of chronic or acute allergic rhinitis confirmed clinically were randomized into control and experimental groups for double blind study. Scoring of clinical symptoms, examinations of the nasal cavity, blood and urine routine examination, functions of liver and kidney and electrocardiogram (ECG) were conducted on day 14 before and after the experiment. The collected data were analyzed statistically. Results The clinical data of the two groups were comparable. The effective rate of desloratadine was significant in allergic rhinitis, being 95.45%. No remarkable adverse effect was noted in this experiment. Conclusion Desloratadine is more effective and safe than loratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and it may be feasible for clinical application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Methods A total of 50 cases of chronic or acute allergic rhinitis confirmed clinically were randomized into control and experimental groups for double blind study. Scoring of clinical symptoms, examinations of the nasal cavity, blood and urine routine examination, functions of liver and kidney and electrocardiogram (ECG) were conducted on day 14 before and after the experiment. The collected data were analyzed statistically. Results The clinical data of the two groups were comparable. The effective rate of desloratadine was significant in allergic rhinitis, being 95.45%. No remarkable adverse effect was noted in this experiment. Conclusion Desloratadine is more effective and safe than loratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and it may be feasible for clinical application.

Key concepts: Desloratadine, Loratadine, Medicine, Adverse effect, Clinical efficacy, Clinical trial, Dermatology, Double blind

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of desloratadine for treating allergic rhinitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens