2003Journal of Shenyang Medical CollegeRequires access

Clinicopathological Analysis of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

Wang Cuifang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, differentiation and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Methods: HE and immunohistochemistry were used to analyze 24 cases with DFSP. Results: The storiform was observated in all DFSP and other spindal cell tumors. But it was not specialized in DFSP. The tumor comprised a variably proportional mixture of fibrous and myxoid areas or pigmented or fibrosarcomatous change. Positive rates of immunostainings were: 100% in Vimentin , 29.1% in AACT, 91.7% in CD34 and 75% in VEGF respectively in cases. Conclusions: DFSP originates from the primary mesenchyme cell of derma and differentiated into various mesenchyme tissues. So the tumor may be classifed subclassfication on histologic features. The diagnosis and prognosis of the subclassification of DFSP are different. The HE staining may diagnose the tumor. Immunohistochemistry staining of CD34 and VEGF may play an important role in the differential diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, differentiation and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Methods: HE and immunohistochemistry were used to analyze 24 cases with DFSP. Results: The storiform was observated in all DFSP and other spindal cell tumors. But it was not specialized in DFSP. The tumor comprised a variably proportional mixture of fibrous and myxoid areas or pigmented or fibrosarcomatous change. Positive rates of immunostainings were: 100% in Vimentin , 29.1% in AACT, 91.7% in CD34 and 75% in VEGF respectively in cases. Conclusions: DFSP originates from the primary mesenchyme cell of derma and differentiated into various mesenchyme tissues. So the tumor may be classifed subclassfication on histologic features. The diagnosis and prognosis of the subclassification of DFSP are different. The HE staining may diagnose the tumor. Immunohistochemistry staining of CD34 and VEGF may play an important role in the differential diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, differentiation and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Methods: HE and immunohistochemistry were used to analyze 24 cases with DFSP. Results: The storiform was observated in all DFSP and other spindal cell tumors. But it was not specialized in DFSP. The tumor comprised a variably proportional mixture of fibrous and myxoid areas or pigmented or fibrosarcomatous change. Positive rates of immunostainings were: 100% in Vimentin , 29.1% in AACT, 91.7% in CD34 and 75% in VEGF respectively in cases. Conclusions: DFSP originates from the primary mesenchyme cell of derma and differentiated into various mesenchyme tissues. So the tumor may be classifed subclassfication on histologic features. The diagnosis and prognosis of the subclassification of DFSP are different. The HE staining may diagnose the tumor. Immunohistochemistry staining of CD34 and VEGF may play an important role in the differential diagnosis.

Key concepts: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, Mesenchyme, CD34, Pathology, Immunohistochemistry, Differential diagnosis, Vimentin, Solitary fibrous tumor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinicopathological Analysis of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans — Research Paper | ScholarLens