2014•Kunming Yike Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of the Effects of Modified Jones Device and Face Bow in Molar Distalization

Li Ta

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical effects of modified Jones device and face bow in molar distalization.Methods 18 patients with mild-to-moderate Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion caused by crowded front teeth were selected in this study,and they could be treated by tooth extraction or non- extraction correction. The selected patients were randomly divided into two groups,and were treated by molar distalization with modified Jones device and face bow,respectively. X-ray cephalometric and model measurement was performed in patients in two groups before and after treatment.Result Both modified Jones device and face bow had obvious effects in molar distalization, but had statistically significant differences in the molar moving speed, anterior overjet and the inclination of the first molar.Conclusions Both methods can effectively push the maxillary molar to far,but face bow method needs good cooperation of patients and can't continue to work,so the clinical curative effect is not very stable. By modified Jones device can more quickly and effectively promote maxillary molar move far,and does not depend on the patient's coordination,so it is worth clinical popularizing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the clinical effects of modified Jones device and face bow in molar distalization.Methods 18 patients with mild-to-moderate Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion caused by crowded front teeth were selected in this study,and they could be treated by tooth extraction or non- extraction correction. The selected patients were randomly divided into two groups,and were treated by molar distalization with modified Jones device and face bow,respectively. X-ray cephalometric and model measurement was performed in patients in two groups before and after treatment.Result Both modified Jones device and face bow had obvious effects in molar distalization, but had statistically significant differences in the molar moving speed, anterior overjet and the inclination of the first molar.Conclusions Both methods can effectively push the maxillary molar to far,but face bow method needs good cooperation of patients and can't continue to work,so the clinical curative effect is not very stable. By modified Jones device can more quickly and effectively promote maxillary molar move far,and does not depend on the patient's coordination,so it is worth clinical popularizing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the clinical effects of modified Jones device and face bow in molar distalization.Methods 18 patients with mild-to-moderate Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion caused by crowded front teeth were selected in this study,and they could be treated by tooth extraction or non- extraction correction. The selected patients were randomly divided into two groups,and were treated by molar distalization with modified Jones device and face bow,respectively. X-ray cephalometric and model measurement was performed in patients in two groups before and after treatment.Result Both modified Jones device and face bow had obvious effects in molar distalization, but had statistically significant differences in the molar moving speed, anterior overjet and the inclination of the first molar.Conclusions Both methods can effectively push the maxillary molar to far,but face bow method needs good cooperation of patients and can't continue to work,so the clinical curative effect is not very stable. By modified Jones device can more quickly and effectively promote maxillary molar move far,and does not depend on the patient's coordination,so it is worth clinical popularizing.

Key concepts: Molar, Maxillary molar, Overjet, Maxillary first molar, Orthodontics, Malocclusion, Dentistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Effects of Modified Jones Device and Face Bow in Molar Distalization — Research Paper | ScholarLens