2014Journal of Microelectromechanical SystemsOpen access

Analysis of Mode-Split Operation in MEMS Based on Piezoresistive Nanogauges

Giacomo Langfelder, Stefano Dellea, A. Berthelot, Patrice Rey, Alessandro Tocchio, Antonio Francesco Longoni

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors based on nanoscale piezoresistive sensing elements (nanogauges) can have mechanical modes either related only to micrometric springs or related also to nanogauge constraints. Due to the different impact that fabrication process imperfections have on these two kinds of modes, their correlation can be poorer from part to part than in sensors based on capacitive readout. In this context, this paper compares the correlation between two modes in MEMS with and without nanogauges. Experiments show a ± 30% relative variation in the modes difference over 26 samples of the former type, which is more than 3.5 times more than what observed on similar structures with no nanogauges. A theoretical model identifies the sources of this fluctuation (local etching and height nonuniformities), and predicts the behavior and improvements using different springs design.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors based on nanoscale piezoresistive sensing elements (nanogauges) can have mechanical modes either related only to micrometric springs or related also to nanogauge constraints. Due to the different impact that fabrication process imperfections have on these two kinds of modes, their correlation can be poorer from part to part than in sensors based on capacitive readout. In this context, this paper compares the correlation between two modes in MEMS with and without nanogauges. Experiments show a ± 30% relative variation in the modes difference over 26 samples of the former type, which is more than 3.5 times more than what observed on similar structures with no nanogauges. A theoretical model identifies the sources of this fluctuation (local etching and height nonuniformities), and predicts the behavior and improvements using different springs design.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors based on nanoscale piezoresistive sensing elements (nanogauges) can have mechanical modes either related only to micrometric springs or related also to nanogauge constraints. Due to the different impact that fabrication process imperfections have on these two kinds of modes, their correlation can be poorer from part to part than in sensors based on capacitive readout. In this context, this paper compares the correlation between two modes in MEMS with and without nanogauges. Experiments show a ± 30% relative variation in the modes difference over 26 samples of the former type, which is more than 3.5 times more than what observed on similar structures with no nanogauges. A theoretical model identifies the sources of this fluctuation (local etching and height nonuniformities), and predicts the behavior and improvements using different springs design.

Key concepts: Piezoresistive effect, Microelectromechanical systems, Capacitive sensing, Context (archaeology), Fabrication, Etching (microfabrication), Materials science, Mode (computer interface)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Mode-Split Operation in MEMS Based on Piezoresistive Nanogauges — Research Paper | ScholarLens