1968•Unpublished venueRequires access

Concentration and Price-Cost Margins in Manufacturing Industries

Norman R. Collins, Lee E. Preston

Open publisher page 130 citations

Abstract

BOTH economic theory and industrial experience suggest that the structural features of an industry strongly influence the competitive behavior of its member firms and the performance outcomesprices, profits, output, etc.-in its markets. Only under narrowly specified and rather extreme theoretical conditions, however, has it been possible to deduce market performance entirely from structural factors. Beyond the limiting cases of complete monopoly and perfect competition, theory is at best a guide to the identification of potentially significant variables and to the development of hypotheses. In an early article, Bain pointed out the need for 'detailed empirical studies which would formulate specific hypotheses on the relations of market structure to market performance and would then test such hypotheses with available evidence'.2 Without underestimating the importance of several recent attempts to increase the relevance of economic theory to the analysis of these relationships, 3 it is generally agreed that new and more precise generalizations as to the relation of industry structure to conduct and performance will depend heavily upon continued empirical research. Such studies would produce results not only of academic interest but also of fundamental importance for the development of relevant and effective public policies for the promotion of market competition.4 The results presented here are based upon an empirical study of certain structural and performance characteristics of an important segment of American industry, food manufacturing. Broadly speaking, this study confirms the importance of structural variables in an

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BOTH economic theory and industrial experience suggest that the structural features of an industry strongly influence the competitive behavior of its member firms and the performance outcomesprices, profits, output, etc.-in its markets. Only under narrowly specified and rather extreme theoretical conditions, however, has it been possible to deduce market performance entirely from structural factors. Beyond the limiting cases of complete monopoly and perfect competition, theory is at best a guide to the identification of potentially significant variables and to the development of hypotheses. In an early article, Bain pointed out the need for 'detailed empirical studies which would formulate specific hypotheses on the relations of market structure to market performance and would then test such hypotheses with available evidence'.2 Without underestimating the importance of several recent attempts to increase the relevance of economic theory to the analysis of these relationships, 3 it is generally agreed that new and more precise generalizations as to the relation of industry structure to conduct and performance will depend heavily upon continued empirical research. Such studies would produce results not only of academic interest but also of fundamental importance for the development of relevant and effective public policies for the promotion of market competition.4 The results presented here are based upon an empirical study of certain structural and performance characteristics of an important segment of American industry, food manufacturing. Broadly speaking, this study confirms the importance of structural variables in an

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 130 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BOTH economic theory and industrial experience suggest that the structural features of an industry strongly influence the competitive behavior of its member firms and the performance outcomesprices, profits, output, etc.-in its markets. Only under narrowly specified and rather extreme theoretical conditions, however, has it been possible to deduce market performance entirely from structural factors. Beyond the limiting cases of complete monopoly and perfect competition, theory is at best a guide to the identification of potentially significant variables and to the development of hypotheses. In an early article, Bain pointed out the need for 'detailed empirical studies which would formulate specific hypotheses on the relations of market structure to market performance and would then test such hypotheses with available evidence'.2 Without underestimating the importance of several recent attempts to increase the relevance of economic theory to the analysis of these relationships, 3 it is generally agreed that new and more precise generalizations as to the relation of industry structure to conduct and performance will depend heavily upon continued empirical research. Such studies would produce results not only of academic interest but also of fundamental importance for the development of relevant and effective public policies for the promotion of market competition.4 The results presented here are based upon an empirical study of certain structural and performance characteristics of an important segment of American industry, food manufacturing. Broadly speaking, this study confirms the importance of structural variables in an

Key concepts: Competition (biology), Monopoly, Empirical research, Promotion (chess), Economics, Industrial organization, Market structure, Relevance (law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Concentration and Price-Cost Margins in Manufacturing Industries — Research Paper | ScholarLens