Optimum contact time and the amortization phase in the bounce drop jump
Mark A. Goss-Sampson, R. Alkureishi, Mike Price
Abstract
Mark A. Goss-Sampson, R. Alkureishi, Mike Price
Abstract
Of the many plyometric techniques available, it has been reported that the bounce drop jump uses the stretch± shortening cycle most effectively (Bobbert et al., 1987: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 19, 332± 338). Mechanistic theories of the stretch± shortening cycle have been proposed. It is generally agreed that, if the time between the eccentric± concentric contraction is too long, then any possible work enhancement is lost. A wide range of values (0.12± 1.0 m) for optimum drop heights has been reported in the literature. Signi® cant neuromuscular differences between plyometrically trained and untrained athletes suggest that drop jump performance is directly related to training history; this leads to difficulties in in defining an optimum height (Viitasalo et al., 1998: European Journal of Applied Physiology, 78, 432± 440). The aims of this study were to establish whether optimum plyometric training could be based on the landing contact time and to determine its relationship with the muscle amortization phase.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Of the many plyometric techniques available, it has been reported that the bounce drop jump uses the stretch± shortening cycle most effectively (Bobbert et al., 1987: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 19, 332± 338). Mechanistic theories of the stretch± shortening cycle have been proposed. It is generally agreed that, if the time between the eccentric± concentric contraction is too long, then any possible work enhancement is lost. A wide range of values (0.12± 1.0 m) for optimum drop heights has been reported in the literature. Signi® cant neuromuscular differences between plyometrically trained and untrained athletes suggest that drop jump performance is directly related to training history; this leads to difficulties in in defining an optimum height (Viitasalo et al., 1998: European Journal of Applied Physiology, 78, 432± 440). The aims of this study were to establish whether optimum plyometric training could be based on the landing contact time and to determine its relationship with the muscle amortization phase.
Key concepts: Stretch shortening cycle, Plyometrics, Jump, Concentric, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Drop (telecommunication), Mathematics, Medicine