2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

When Dispute Resolution Begets Disputes of its Own: Conflicts Among Dispute Professionals

Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

I. THE PuRPoSES OF ADR: EmCIENCY, QUALITY, \nOR jUSTICE VALUES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 1871 II. WHO SHOULD THE ACTORS BE IN ADR? • . • . . . • . . . • • . . . . . . . • • . . . 1876 \nIII. WHAT PROCESSES CoNSTITUTE ADR? . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1885 \nIV. To WHAT USES SHOULD ADR BE PuT? • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 1897 \nV. ETHICS AND STANDARDS IN THE USB OF ADR: FOR WHAT PuRPoSES? . • . • • . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . • 1922 \nVII. RESoLVING THE DISPUTES AMONG DISPUTE PROFESSIONALS: OF POUCY CHOICES AND PROCESS . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • 1930 ~ the processes comprising alternative, or as we now say, "appropriate" dispute resolution mature and enter new phases of use, new issues \nhave emerged to demonstrate that professionals engaged in providing dis· \npute resolution services have disputes and conflicts among themselves. \nThis Article reviews some of those conflicts and issues and suggests some \nresolutions for these disputes between dispute resolvers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I. THE PuRPoSES OF ADR: EmCIENCY, QUALITY, \nOR jUSTICE VALUES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 1871 II. WHO SHOULD THE ACTORS BE IN ADR? • . • . . . • . . . • • . . . . . . . • • . . . 1876 \nIII. WHAT PROCESSES CoNSTITUTE ADR? . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1885 \nIV. To WHAT USES SHOULD ADR BE PuT? • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 1897 \nV. ETHICS AND STANDARDS IN THE USB OF ADR: FOR WHAT PuRPoSES? . • . • • . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . • 1922 \nVII. RESoLVING THE DISPUTES AMONG DISPUTE PROFESSIONALS: OF POUCY CHOICES AND PROCESS . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • 1930 ~ the processes comprising alternative, or as we now say, "appropriate" dispute resolution mature and enter new phases of use, new issues \nhave emerged to demonstrate that professionals engaged in providing dis· \npute resolution services have disputes and conflicts among themselves. \nThis Article reviews some of those conflicts and issues and suggests some \nresolutions for these disputes between dispute resolvers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I. THE PuRPoSES OF ADR: EmCIENCY, QUALITY, \nOR jUSTICE VALUES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 1871 II. WHO SHOULD THE ACTORS BE IN ADR? • . • . . . • . . . • • . . . . . . . • • . . . 1876 \nIII. WHAT PROCESSES CoNSTITUTE ADR? . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1885 \nIV. To WHAT USES SHOULD ADR BE PuT? • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 1897 \nV. ETHICS AND STANDARDS IN THE USB OF ADR: FOR WHAT PuRPoSES? . • . • • . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . • 1922 \nVII. RESoLVING THE DISPUTES AMONG DISPUTE PROFESSIONALS: OF POUCY CHOICES AND PROCESS . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • 1930 ~ the processes comprising alternative, or as we now say, "appropriate" dispute resolution mature and enter new phases of use, new issues \nhave emerged to demonstrate that professionals engaged in providing dis· \npute resolution services have disputes and conflicts among themselves. \nThis Article reviews some of those conflicts and issues and suggests some \nresolutions for these disputes between dispute resolvers.

Key concepts: Dispute resolution, Political science, Dispute mechanism, Law, Psychology, Alternative dispute resolution, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
When Dispute Resolution Begets Disputes of its Own: Conflicts Among Dispute Professionals — Research Paper | ScholarLens