1978OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

New approach to dry SO/sub 2/ removal

R.B. Fockler, W.V. Botts, J.H. Phelen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Technical report:A process for cleaning boiler flue gas features an open-loop, two-stage design. In the first stage, sulfur dioxide is removed using a spray dryer contactor. The second stage removes particulates using either an electrostatic precipitator or a fabric filter collector. Advantages of the process include: low installation cost; simple operation; online maintenance; and a dry product instead of the usual sludge produced by wet removal were met, with as much as 92% removal accomplished, though 80% removal would be more typical. The fabric filter also produced satisfactory results. While the economics of flue gas desulfurization and particulate control are site specific, the general economics, including capital costs, operating and labor costs, maintenance, and water consumption costs, give a total operating cost of 3.0 mills/kwh/yr. (1 diagram, 1 table)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Technical report:A process for cleaning boiler flue gas features an open-loop, two-stage design. In the first stage, sulfur dioxide is removed using a spray dryer contactor. The second stage removes particulates using either an electrostatic precipitator or a fabric filter collector. Advantages of the process include: low installation cost; simple operation; online maintenance; and a dry product instead of the usual sludge produced by wet removal were met, with as much as 92% removal accomplished, though 80% removal would be more typical. The fabric filter also produced satisfactory results. While the economics of flue gas desulfurization and particulate control are site specific, the general economics, including capital costs, operating and labor costs, maintenance, and water consumption costs, give a total operating cost of 3.0 mills/kwh/yr. (1 diagram, 1 table)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Technical report:A process for cleaning boiler flue gas features an open-loop, two-stage design. In the first stage, sulfur dioxide is removed using a spray dryer contactor. The second stage removes particulates using either an electrostatic precipitator or a fabric filter collector. Advantages of the process include: low installation cost; simple operation; online maintenance; and a dry product instead of the usual sludge produced by wet removal were met, with as much as 92% removal accomplished, though 80% removal would be more typical. The fabric filter also produced satisfactory results. While the economics of flue gas desulfurization and particulate control are site specific, the general economics, including capital costs, operating and labor costs, maintenance, and water consumption costs, give a total operating cost of 3.0 mills/kwh/yr. (1 diagram, 1 table)

Key concepts: Flue gas, Waste management, Flue-gas desulfurization, Electrostatic precipitator, Sulfur dioxide, Boiler (water heating), Capital cost, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New approach to dry SO/sub 2/ removal — Research Paper | ScholarLens