Chemical Weed Control in Cotton
R. S. Panwar, R. S. Malik, Sunayana Rathi, R. K. Malik
Abstract
R. S. Panwar, R. S. Malik, Sunayana Rathi, R. K. Malik
Abstract
Application of pendimethalin and trifluralin at 1000 g ha−1 and pyrithiobac at 100 g ha−1 reduced the population and dry weight of weeds significantly over weedy check. Fluazifop-butyl was only effective against barnyard grass, while pyrithiobac controlled carpet weed. One hoeing at 45 DAS fb acetochlor at 1500 g ha−1 was most effective in controlling both the weeds and gave significantly higher seed cotton yield than weedy check. The next best treatment was pyrithiobac+fluazifop-butyl at 100+500 g ha−1 when applied as post-emergence.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application of pendimethalin and trifluralin at 1000 g ha−1 and pyrithiobac at 100 g ha−1 reduced the population and dry weight of weeds significantly over weedy check. Fluazifop-butyl was only effective against barnyard grass, while pyrithiobac controlled carpet weed. One hoeing at 45 DAS fb acetochlor at 1500 g ha−1 was most effective in controlling both the weeds and gave significantly higher seed cotton yield than weedy check. The next best treatment was pyrithiobac+fluazifop-butyl at 100+500 g ha−1 when applied as post-emergence.
Key concepts: Pendimethalin, Trifluralin, Weed control, Veterinary medicine, Weed, Agronomy, Population, Acetochlor