1980Proc. Am. Power Conf.; (United States)Requires access

Supplementing coal with solid-waste fuels. [Conference paper]

W. H. Pollock

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There are three major potential advantages obtained when the supplementing coal with solid-waste fuels; they are: reduce solid-waste disposal problems; reduce total plant SO/sub 2/ emissions; lower total fuel cost. While there are many possible waste fuel-cost combinations that achieved the desired results, several combinations produced higher SO/sub 2/ emissions or higher total fuel costs. Each boiler installation has unique site requirements. In most instances, a detailed study must be performed by an architect/engineer and/or boiler manufacturer to determine the feasibility of adding the waste fuel to an existing or new boiler. Many existing boilers may not be designed suitably for the additional waste fuel requirements. Becoming familiar with the fundamentals of combustion for waste fuel firing, in addition to the normal auxiliary requirements, will ensure that the maximum number of practical waste fuel-coal combinations are identified and implemented. 3 references, 17 figures, 6 tables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are three major potential advantages obtained when the supplementing coal with solid-waste fuels; they are: reduce solid-waste disposal problems; reduce total plant SO/sub 2/ emissions; lower total fuel cost. While there are many possible waste fuel-cost combinations that achieved the desired results, several combinations produced higher SO/sub 2/ emissions or higher total fuel costs. Each boiler installation has unique site requirements. In most instances, a detailed study must be performed by an architect/engineer and/or boiler manufacturer to determine the feasibility of adding the waste fuel to an existing or new boiler. Many existing boilers may not be designed suitably for the additional waste fuel requirements. Becoming familiar with the fundamentals of combustion for waste fuel firing, in addition to the normal auxiliary requirements, will ensure that the maximum number of practical waste fuel-coal combinations are identified and implemented. 3 references, 17 figures, 6 tables.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are three major potential advantages obtained when the supplementing coal with solid-waste fuels; they are: reduce solid-waste disposal problems; reduce total plant SO/sub 2/ emissions; lower total fuel cost. While there are many possible waste fuel-cost combinations that achieved the desired results, several combinations produced higher SO/sub 2/ emissions or higher total fuel costs. Each boiler installation has unique site requirements. In most instances, a detailed study must be performed by an architect/engineer and/or boiler manufacturer to determine the feasibility of adding the waste fuel to an existing or new boiler. Many existing boilers may not be designed suitably for the additional waste fuel requirements. Becoming familiar with the fundamentals of combustion for waste fuel firing, in addition to the normal auxiliary requirements, will ensure that the maximum number of practical waste fuel-coal combinations are identified and implemented. 3 references, 17 figures, 6 tables.

Key concepts: Waste management, Boiler (water heating), Coal, Engineering, Refuse-derived fuel, Solid fuel, Combustion, Municipal solid waste

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supplementing coal with solid-waste fuels. [Conference paper] — Research Paper | ScholarLens