1976OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Converting to coal: how the savings stack up against cost and aggravation

B. P. Breen, A.W. Bell

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Compelling reasons abound to consider converting boilers to coal from oil or gas. Calculations have shown that the savings can be large (Energy Research Reports, September 1975). At current prices, converting a boiler that produces 200,000 pounds of steam per hour will cut fuel costs by $140 to $230 per hour. Power plants vary as do coals; the abundance of technical problems raised by these variations can be grouped in three classes: coal handling and ash removal, emission control, and boiler modifications. Only boiler modifications are discussed in this paper, but potential converts should be aware that the other classes can be as complex. Gas, oil, and coal impose unique requirements for boiler design, affecting such components as burners, the fuel-supply system, such accessories as soot blowers and fans, and boiler-control systems. Furnace size and spacing of convective tubes are especially important because they can make it impossible to convert from gas to coal. (MCW)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compelling reasons abound to consider converting boilers to coal from oil or gas. Calculations have shown that the savings can be large (Energy Research Reports, September 1975). At current prices, converting a boiler that produces 200,000 pounds of steam per hour will cut fuel costs by $140 to $230 per hour. Power plants vary as do coals; the abundance of technical problems raised by these variations can be grouped in three classes: coal handling and ash removal, emission control, and boiler modifications. Only boiler modifications are discussed in this paper, but potential converts should be aware that the other classes can be as complex. Gas, oil, and coal impose unique requirements for boiler design, affecting such components as burners, the fuel-supply system, such accessories as soot blowers and fans, and boiler-control systems. Furnace size and spacing of convective tubes are especially important because they can make it impossible to convert from gas to coal. (MCW)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compelling reasons abound to consider converting boilers to coal from oil or gas. Calculations have shown that the savings can be large (Energy Research Reports, September 1975). At current prices, converting a boiler that produces 200,000 pounds of steam per hour will cut fuel costs by $140 to $230 per hour. Power plants vary as do coals; the abundance of technical problems raised by these variations can be grouped in three classes: coal handling and ash removal, emission control, and boiler modifications. Only boiler modifications are discussed in this paper, but potential converts should be aware that the other classes can be as complex. Gas, oil, and coal impose unique requirements for boiler design, affecting such components as burners, the fuel-supply system, such accessories as soot blowers and fans, and boiler-control systems. Furnace size and spacing of convective tubes are especially important because they can make it impossible to convert from gas to coal. (MCW)

Key concepts: Boiler (water heating), Coal, Waste management, Engineering, Fuel oil, Environmental science, Process engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Converting to coal: how the savings stack up against cost and aggravation — Research Paper | ScholarLens