1980OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Selecting industrial fuel-III

Bob Richardson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A Milwaukee, Wisconsin, industrial company is described whose two powerhouse boilers (converted from coal to natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil) became vulnerable to fuel supply disruption. An analysis was carried out on three options: (1) conversion of the largest and newest C.E. boiler to coal; (2) installation of a new coal-fired boiler; and (3) installation of a new electric boiler. Analysis included considerations of operating costs, manpower, steam demand, investment costs, convertability, air pollution, space requirements, future fuel availability, and future fuel costs. The economic analysis identified the coal conversion alternative as the preferred option. It was concluded that further analysis is required based on the peak steam demand and steam use growth. This future analysis should determine whether a new coal unit is necessary or whether the coal conversion alternative is most desirable. (MJJ)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A Milwaukee, Wisconsin, industrial company is described whose two powerhouse boilers (converted from coal to natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil) became vulnerable to fuel supply disruption. An analysis was carried out on three options: (1) conversion of the largest and newest C.E. boiler to coal; (2) installation of a new coal-fired boiler; and (3) installation of a new electric boiler. Analysis included considerations of operating costs, manpower, steam demand, investment costs, convertability, air pollution, space requirements, future fuel availability, and future fuel costs. The economic analysis identified the coal conversion alternative as the preferred option. It was concluded that further analysis is required based on the peak steam demand and steam use growth. This future analysis should determine whether a new coal unit is necessary or whether the coal conversion alternative is most desirable. (MJJ)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A Milwaukee, Wisconsin, industrial company is described whose two powerhouse boilers (converted from coal to natural gas and No. 2 fuel oil) became vulnerable to fuel supply disruption. An analysis was carried out on three options: (1) conversion of the largest and newest C.E. boiler to coal; (2) installation of a new coal-fired boiler; and (3) installation of a new electric boiler. Analysis included considerations of operating costs, manpower, steam demand, investment costs, convertability, air pollution, space requirements, future fuel availability, and future fuel costs. The economic analysis identified the coal conversion alternative as the preferred option. It was concluded that further analysis is required based on the peak steam demand and steam use growth. This future analysis should determine whether a new coal unit is necessary or whether the coal conversion alternative is most desirable. (MJJ)

Key concepts: Boiler (water heating), Coal, Waste management, Engineering, Fuel oil, Natural gas, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selecting industrial fuel-III — Research Paper | ScholarLens