2014Pesticide Research JournalRequires access

Newer Synthetic and Biorational Insecticides against Aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) on Plantago ovata Forsk.

SK Khinchi, KC Kumawat

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The relative efficacy of eleven insecticides against the aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) revealed that dimethoate emulsion (0.03%) was the most effective followed by imidacloprid (0.005% solution), thiamethoxam (0.025% dispersion) and acephate (0.037% solution). Vertimec (9.5 mg a.i. L−1 emulsion), spinosad (0.01% suspension) and diflubenzuron (0.05% emulsion) ranked in the middle order of effectiveness. Metarrhizium anisopliae (1×108 spores L−1), Beauveria bassiana (1 ×108 spores L−1), karanj seed extract (5 mL L−1), and neem seed kernel extract (5 mL L−1) were the least effective. The maximum yield was recorded from the plots treated with dimethoate (7.79 q ha−1) followed by imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and the minimum from M. Anisopliae (5.37 q ha−1). The highest benefit:cost ratio (39.51:1) was obtained in dimethoate treatment followed by acephate (36.92:1) and imidacloprid (24.84:1). Plots treated with spinosad showed negative benefit:cost ratio (0.28:1).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relative efficacy of eleven insecticides against the aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) revealed that dimethoate emulsion (0.03%) was the most effective followed by imidacloprid (0.005% solution), thiamethoxam (0.025% dispersion) and acephate (0.037% solution). Vertimec (9.5 mg a.i. L−1 emulsion), spinosad (0.01% suspension) and diflubenzuron (0.05% emulsion) ranked in the middle order of effectiveness. Metarrhizium anisopliae (1×108 spores L−1), Beauveria bassiana (1 ×108 spores L−1), karanj seed extract (5 mL L−1), and neem seed kernel extract (5 mL L−1) were the least effective. The maximum yield was recorded from the plots treated with dimethoate (7.79 q ha−1) followed by imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and the minimum from M. Anisopliae (5.37 q ha−1). The highest benefit:cost ratio (39.51:1) was obtained in dimethoate treatment followed by acephate (36.92:1) and imidacloprid (24.84:1). Plots treated with spinosad showed negative benefit:cost ratio (0.28:1).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relative efficacy of eleven insecticides against the aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) revealed that dimethoate emulsion (0.03%) was the most effective followed by imidacloprid (0.005% solution), thiamethoxam (0.025% dispersion) and acephate (0.037% solution). Vertimec (9.5 mg a.i. L−1 emulsion), spinosad (0.01% suspension) and diflubenzuron (0.05% emulsion) ranked in the middle order of effectiveness. Metarrhizium anisopliae (1×108 spores L−1), Beauveria bassiana (1 ×108 spores L−1), karanj seed extract (5 mL L−1), and neem seed kernel extract (5 mL L−1) were the least effective. The maximum yield was recorded from the plots treated with dimethoate (7.79 q ha−1) followed by imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and the minimum from M. Anisopliae (5.37 q ha−1). The highest benefit:cost ratio (39.51:1) was obtained in dimethoate treatment followed by acephate (36.92:1) and imidacloprid (24.84:1). Plots treated with spinosad showed negative benefit:cost ratio (0.28:1).

Key concepts: Dimethoate, Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid, Acephate, Spinosad, Aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis, Toxicology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Newer Synthetic and Biorational Insecticides against Aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) on Plantago ovata Forsk. — Research Paper | ScholarLens