1973Highway Research RecordRequires access

COST COMPARISON OF BUSWAY AND RAILWAY RAPID TRANSIT

David R. Miller, B C Goodwin, George A. Hoffman, Wht Holden

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Costs of bus-on-busways and train rapid transit systems were compared at varying passenger capacities on hypothetical new routes using both current and future vehicle equipment. Th calculations indicated that fast transit service could currently be provided at comparable costs by either buses or trains at about 2,000 to 5,000 passengers per peak hour, based on equipment and facilities of recent design. Improved or enlarged designs of current bus and transit equipment tend to shift the bus-train equivalence or crossover region another 1,000 or 2,000 passengers per hour and to somewhat reduce the modal differences in costs between bus and train below that capacity. Above these capacities, rail systems provide lower total costs. The study concluded with a prognosis of future developments in transit and bus technology that will enhance the quality of service while affording some possibilities for cost reduction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Costs of bus-on-busways and train rapid transit systems were compared at varying passenger capacities on hypothetical new routes using both current and future vehicle equipment. Th calculations indicated that fast transit service could currently be provided at comparable costs by either buses or trains at about 2,000 to 5,000 passengers per peak hour, based on equipment and facilities of recent design. Improved or enlarged designs of current bus and transit equipment tend to shift the bus-train equivalence or crossover region another 1,000 or 2,000 passengers per hour and to somewhat reduce the modal differences in costs between bus and train below that capacity. Above these capacities, rail systems provide lower total costs. The study concluded with a prognosis of future developments in transit and bus technology that will enhance the quality of service while affording some possibilities for cost reduction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Costs of bus-on-busways and train rapid transit systems were compared at varying passenger capacities on hypothetical new routes using both current and future vehicle equipment. Th calculations indicated that fast transit service could currently be provided at comparable costs by either buses or trains at about 2,000 to 5,000 passengers per peak hour, based on equipment and facilities of recent design. Improved or enlarged designs of current bus and transit equipment tend to shift the bus-train equivalence or crossover region another 1,000 or 2,000 passengers per hour and to somewhat reduce the modal differences in costs between bus and train below that capacity. Above these capacities, rail systems provide lower total costs. The study concluded with a prognosis of future developments in transit and bus technology that will enhance the quality of service while affording some possibilities for cost reduction.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Transit (satellite), Train, Public transport, Engineering, Service (business), Park and ride, Service quality

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COST COMPARISON OF BUSWAY AND RAILWAY RAPID TRANSIT — Research Paper | ScholarLens