1976Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

EVALUATION OF RAIL RAPID TRANSIT AND EXPRESS BUS SERVICE IN THE URBAN COMMUTER MARKET (ABRIDGEMENT)

J H Boyd, Norman J Asher, Elliott S Wetzler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The basic alternative transportation modes in the urban commuter market, which are bus and rail transit, are covered in this paper. Comparing these alternatives on the basis of full cost, which includes supplier cost (costs for vehicle, way, and structure) and user-time cost (costs for access, waiting, in-vehicle transfer, and egress time), is dealt with. A modern rail rapid transit line has about the same passenger-carrying capacity as a bus system has if the bus system uses an exclusive busway for line-haul and surface streets for downtown distribution. The levels of user-time cost for a modern rail rapid transit line are equivalent to those for a bus system, but the supplier costs are much higher for rail rapid transit. Lower full cost can be achieved for low-density, short-haul residential collection if 8-passenger bus-wagon jitneys are used instead of 50-passenger buses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The basic alternative transportation modes in the urban commuter market, which are bus and rail transit, are covered in this paper. Comparing these alternatives on the basis of full cost, which includes supplier cost (costs for vehicle, way, and structure) and user-time cost (costs for access, waiting, in-vehicle transfer, and egress time), is dealt with. A modern rail rapid transit line has about the same passenger-carrying capacity as a bus system has if the bus system uses an exclusive busway for line-haul and surface streets for downtown distribution. The levels of user-time cost for a modern rail rapid transit line are equivalent to those for a bus system, but the supplier costs are much higher for rail rapid transit. Lower full cost can be achieved for low-density, short-haul residential collection if 8-passenger bus-wagon jitneys are used instead of 50-passenger buses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The basic alternative transportation modes in the urban commuter market, which are bus and rail transit, are covered in this paper. Comparing these alternatives on the basis of full cost, which includes supplier cost (costs for vehicle, way, and structure) and user-time cost (costs for access, waiting, in-vehicle transfer, and egress time), is dealt with. A modern rail rapid transit line has about the same passenger-carrying capacity as a bus system has if the bus system uses an exclusive busway for line-haul and surface streets for downtown distribution. The levels of user-time cost for a modern rail rapid transit line are equivalent to those for a bus system, but the supplier costs are much higher for rail rapid transit. Lower full cost can be achieved for low-density, short-haul residential collection if 8-passenger bus-wagon jitneys are used instead of 50-passenger buses.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Downtown, Transit (satellite), Public transport, Rail transit, Service (business), Line (geometry), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION OF RAIL RAPID TRANSIT AND EXPRESS BUS SERVICE IN THE URBAN COMMUTER MARKET (ABRIDGEMENT) — Research Paper | ScholarLens