2012•Journal of battlefield technologyRequires access

Should we assess distributed situation awareness before, during or after command and control activity?

Linda Johnstone Sorensen, Neville A. Stanton

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Command and control (C2) environments are characterised by rapid pace of change, complex yet often incomplete information with considerable time and decision-making pressures. These pressures create particularly challenging environments in which teams must operate. Advances in information and communication technology afford new ways of organizing C2 structures and support to military personnel. New technologies and ways of working require assessment of their impact on situational awareness (SA). This paper considers the question of when Distributed Situation Awareness (DSA) should be assessed; before, during or after C2 activity. The paper presents a review of three DSA data collection methods: Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), Communication Analysis, and Critical Decision Method (CDM) against fourteen criteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Command and control (C2) environments are characterised by rapid pace of change, complex yet often incomplete information with considerable time and decision-making pressures. These pressures create particularly challenging environments in which teams must operate. Advances in information and communication technology afford new ways of organizing C2 structures and support to military personnel. New technologies and ways of working require assessment of their impact on situational awareness (SA). This paper considers the question of when Distributed Situation Awareness (DSA) should be assessed; before, during or after C2 activity. The paper presents a review of three DSA data collection methods: Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), Communication Analysis, and Critical Decision Method (CDM) against fourteen criteria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Command and control (C2) environments are characterised by rapid pace of change, complex yet often incomplete information with considerable time and decision-making pressures. These pressures create particularly challenging environments in which teams must operate. Advances in information and communication technology afford new ways of organizing C2 structures and support to military personnel. New technologies and ways of working require assessment of their impact on situational awareness (SA). This paper considers the question of when Distributed Situation Awareness (DSA) should be assessed; before, during or after C2 activity. The paper presents a review of three DSA data collection methods: Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), Communication Analysis, and Critical Decision Method (CDM) against fourteen criteria.

Key concepts: Situation awareness, Command and control, Pace, Control (management), Task (project management), Project commissioning, Process management, Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should we assess distributed situation awareness before, during or after command and control activity? — Research Paper | ScholarLens