1981•Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

NEW PERSPECTIVES ON CLOSURE OF RAILROAD-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSINGS AS A SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

E R Russell

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

There are approximately 400,000 at-grade railroad-highway crossings in the United States; 219,000 are public at-grade crossings and roughly 166,440 of these have only crossbucks as warning devices. A conservative estimate is that it would cost more than $6 billion to install automatic warning devices at all these crossings, and the money is not available. Low-cost alternative solutions must be found to reduce the potential for death and destruction at these sites. A study now in progress is described that includes library and field research to determine and document the pros and cons of considering the closing of a railroad-highway grade crossing as a viable alternative when crossings and community needs are assessed. The main objective is a set of guidelines so that community impacts (benefits and disbenefits) can be assessed and form the basis on which community leaders, local highway authorities, and railroad personnel can negotiate. The benefits of closure are not one-sided: i.e., they are not all railroad-related. There can be many community benefits, which are enumerated and fully discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are approximately 400,000 at-grade railroad-highway crossings in the United States; 219,000 are public at-grade crossings and roughly 166,440 of these have only crossbucks as warning devices. A conservative estimate is that it would cost more than $6 billion to install automatic warning devices at all these crossings, and the money is not available. Low-cost alternative solutions must be found to reduce the potential for death and destruction at these sites. A study now in progress is described that includes library and field research to determine and document the pros and cons of considering the closing of a railroad-highway grade crossing as a viable alternative when crossings and community needs are assessed. The main objective is a set of guidelines so that community impacts (benefits and disbenefits) can be assessed and form the basis on which community leaders, local highway authorities, and railroad personnel can negotiate. The benefits of closure are not one-sided: i.e., they are not all railroad-related. There can be many community benefits, which are enumerated and fully discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are approximately 400,000 at-grade railroad-highway crossings in the United States; 219,000 are public at-grade crossings and roughly 166,440 of these have only crossbucks as warning devices. A conservative estimate is that it would cost more than $6 billion to install automatic warning devices at all these crossings, and the money is not available. Low-cost alternative solutions must be found to reduce the potential for death and destruction at these sites. A study now in progress is described that includes library and field research to determine and document the pros and cons of considering the closing of a railroad-highway grade crossing as a viable alternative when crossings and community needs are assessed. The main objective is a set of guidelines so that community impacts (benefits and disbenefits) can be assessed and form the basis on which community leaders, local highway authorities, and railroad personnel can negotiate. The benefits of closure are not one-sided: i.e., they are not all railroad-related. There can be many community benefits, which are enumerated and fully discussed.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Closure (psychology), Negotiation, Level crossing, Highway system, Cost–benefit analysis, Closing (real estate), Warning system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON CLOSURE OF RAILROAD-HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSINGS AS A SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens