1998•Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Consolidation in Kansas

E R Russell, Madaniyo I. Mutabazi

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Consolidation or closure of unnecessary grade crossings is a cost-effective but difficult-to-achieve option for increasing the safety of highway-rail grade crossings. Consolidation not only needs traffic engineering expertise, it also needs the support of local government officials and citizens. It is as much a public relations effort as an engineering exercise. To win local support, proposals for closing selected crossings should appear reasonable to the public, that is, the public should be able to see a need or net benefit. A corridor study is more effective than targeting single crossings for closure. Selecting a corridor with high-potential closure candidates can be the key to the success of winning local approval. Finding the most “hazardous” crossings can help select high-potential corridors. The development of a model to pinpoint Kansas’ best candidates for closure as a key step in selecting corridors where consolidation efforts should be concentrated is described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Consolidation or closure of unnecessary grade crossings is a cost-effective but difficult-to-achieve option for increasing the safety of highway-rail grade crossings. Consolidation not only needs traffic engineering expertise, it also needs the support of local government officials and citizens. It is as much a public relations effort as an engineering exercise. To win local support, proposals for closing selected crossings should appear reasonable to the public, that is, the public should be able to see a need or net benefit. A corridor study is more effective than targeting single crossings for closure. Selecting a corridor with high-potential closure candidates can be the key to the success of winning local approval. Finding the most “hazardous” crossings can help select high-potential corridors. The development of a model to pinpoint Kansas’ best candidates for closure as a key step in selecting corridors where consolidation efforts should be concentrated is described.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Consolidation or closure of unnecessary grade crossings is a cost-effective but difficult-to-achieve option for increasing the safety of highway-rail grade crossings. Consolidation not only needs traffic engineering expertise, it also needs the support of local government officials and citizens. It is as much a public relations effort as an engineering exercise. To win local support, proposals for closing selected crossings should appear reasonable to the public, that is, the public should be able to see a need or net benefit. A corridor study is more effective than targeting single crossings for closure. Selecting a corridor with high-potential closure candidates can be the key to the success of winning local approval. Finding the most “hazardous” crossings can help select high-potential corridors. The development of a model to pinpoint Kansas’ best candidates for closure as a key step in selecting corridors where consolidation efforts should be concentrated is described.

Key concepts: Consolidation (business), Transport engineering, Closure (psychology), Engineering, Local government, Business, Finance, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Consolidation in Kansas — Research Paper | ScholarLens