Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Consolidation in Kansas
E R Russell, Madaniyo I. Mutabazi
Abstract
E R Russell, Madaniyo I. Mutabazi
Abstract
Consolidation or closure of unnecessary grade crossings is a cost-effective but difficult-to-achieve option for increasing the safety of highway-rail grade crossings. Consolidation not only needs traffic engineering expertise, it also needs the support of local government officials and citizens. It is as much a public relations effort as an engineering exercise. To win local support, proposals for closing selected crossings should appear reasonable to the public, that is, the public should be able to see a need or net benefit. A corridor study is more effective than targeting single crossings for closure. Selecting a corridor with high-potential closure candidates can be the key to the success of winning local approval. Finding the most “hazardous” crossings can help select high-potential corridors. The development of a model to pinpoint Kansas’ best candidates for closure as a key step in selecting corridors where consolidation efforts should be concentrated is described.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Consolidation or closure of unnecessary grade crossings is a cost-effective but difficult-to-achieve option for increasing the safety of highway-rail grade crossings. Consolidation not only needs traffic engineering expertise, it also needs the support of local government officials and citizens. It is as much a public relations effort as an engineering exercise. To win local support, proposals for closing selected crossings should appear reasonable to the public, that is, the public should be able to see a need or net benefit. A corridor study is more effective than targeting single crossings for closure. Selecting a corridor with high-potential closure candidates can be the key to the success of winning local approval. Finding the most “hazardous” crossings can help select high-potential corridors. The development of a model to pinpoint Kansas’ best candidates for closure as a key step in selecting corridors where consolidation efforts should be concentrated is described.
Key concepts: Consolidation (business), Transport engineering, Closure (psychology), Engineering, Local government, Business, Finance, Political science