1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

The signal engineer's perception

Chris Turner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The responsibility and total accountability for the design, installation and maintenance of active level crossing protection devices has always been and still does rest with Rail Authorities. In all States there has been increasing awareness that the decision on which of the current accepted protection levels is most suitable at each location is best handled jointly by Rail and Road Authorities in accordance with some form of defendable warrant. The area of funding responsibility has been the subject of ongoing debate and, although it obviously needs to be resolved, it is not the most critical issue at hand. The areas that are fundamental to progress beyond the current situation in relation to level crossing protection are accountability and liability. Until these issues are addressed it is unlikely that any significant change will be possible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The responsibility and total accountability for the design, installation and maintenance of active level crossing protection devices has always been and still does rest with Rail Authorities. In all States there has been increasing awareness that the decision on which of the current accepted protection levels is most suitable at each location is best handled jointly by Rail and Road Authorities in accordance with some form of defendable warrant. The area of funding responsibility has been the subject of ongoing debate and, although it obviously needs to be resolved, it is not the most critical issue at hand. The areas that are fundamental to progress beyond the current situation in relation to level crossing protection are accountability and liability. Until these issues are addressed it is unlikely that any significant change will be possible.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The responsibility and total accountability for the design, installation and maintenance of active level crossing protection devices has always been and still does rest with Rail Authorities. In all States there has been increasing awareness that the decision on which of the current accepted protection levels is most suitable at each location is best handled jointly by Rail and Road Authorities in accordance with some form of defendable warrant. The area of funding responsibility has been the subject of ongoing debate and, although it obviously needs to be resolved, it is not the most critical issue at hand. The areas that are fundamental to progress beyond the current situation in relation to level crossing protection are accountability and liability. Until these issues are addressed it is unlikely that any significant change will be possible.

Key concepts: Accountability, Warrant, Rest (music), Perception, Liability, Risk analysis (engineering), Business, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The signal engineer's perception — Research Paper | ScholarLens