1982Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

LOS ANGELES URBAN TRANSPORTATION: WHO HAS THE POWER?

Peter L. Shaw, Renee B Simon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 1976, the California Legislature took a bold step toward untangling the transportation planning snarl that has characterized Southern California. Believing that only a new and innovative transportation policy planning and coordinating institution could solve the problems, the legislators adopted Assembly Bill 1246, which created transportation commissions in four Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernadino. Of the four, Los Angeles is the largest and faces the most complex and difficult-to-solve transportation problems. The development, structure, authority, and operations of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission are described. The Commission is directed by 10 of the principal county and city elected officials and one citizen member. Its powers include short-range planning, policy and program development, project selection, new system development, and resource generation and allocation (power of the purse). For Southern California, this particular blend of powers and institutional form is innovative and has the potential for making significant public impacts. The Commission is fully operational and is involved with a solid schedule of activities. Not all of its major powers are being used, but most are, and the impact is slowly being felt on the decisionmaking process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1976, the California Legislature took a bold step toward untangling the transportation planning snarl that has characterized Southern California. Believing that only a new and innovative transportation policy planning and coordinating institution could solve the problems, the legislators adopted Assembly Bill 1246, which created transportation commissions in four Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernadino. Of the four, Los Angeles is the largest and faces the most complex and difficult-to-solve transportation problems. The development, structure, authority, and operations of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission are described. The Commission is directed by 10 of the principal county and city elected officials and one citizen member. Its powers include short-range planning, policy and program development, project selection, new system development, and resource generation and allocation (power of the purse). For Southern California, this particular blend of powers and institutional form is innovative and has the potential for making significant public impacts. The Commission is fully operational and is involved with a solid schedule of activities. Not all of its major powers are being used, but most are, and the impact is slowly being felt on the decisionmaking process.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1976, the California Legislature took a bold step toward untangling the transportation planning snarl that has characterized Southern California. Believing that only a new and innovative transportation policy planning and coordinating institution could solve the problems, the legislators adopted Assembly Bill 1246, which created transportation commissions in four Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernadino. Of the four, Los Angeles is the largest and faces the most complex and difficult-to-solve transportation problems. The development, structure, authority, and operations of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission are described. The Commission is directed by 10 of the principal county and city elected officials and one citizen member. Its powers include short-range planning, policy and program development, project selection, new system development, and resource generation and allocation (power of the purse). For Southern California, this particular blend of powers and institutional form is innovative and has the potential for making significant public impacts. The Commission is fully operational and is involved with a solid schedule of activities. Not all of its major powers are being used, but most are, and the impact is slowly being felt on the decisionmaking process.

Key concepts: Commission, Transportation planning, Legislature, Schedule, Public administration, Public transport, Public participation, Principal (computer security)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOS ANGELES URBAN TRANSPORTATION: WHO HAS THE POWER? — Research Paper | ScholarLens