1997Unpublished venueRequires access

Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California

Paul G. Lewis, Mary Sprague

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, to be quoted without written permission, provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. Foreword The reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) in 1997 raises three issues of great importance to California—how many dollars will the state receive from future transportation programs? Who will pay the cost? And what level of government will distribute the benefits? In this report, Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California, Paul Lewis and Mary Sprague focus on the third issue—the role metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) have played in setting project priorities under the current transportation legislation. The authors conclude that metropolitan-level decisionmaking generates a distinctly different set of priorities than found at either the state or local level, and that the role of MPOs should be considered carefully when reauthorization of ISTEA takes place in Washington later this year.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, to be quoted without written permission, provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. Foreword The reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) in 1997 raises three issues of great importance to California—how many dollars will the state receive from future transportation programs? Who will pay the cost? And what level of government will distribute the benefits? In this report, Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California, Paul Lewis and Mary Sprague focus on the third issue—the role metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) have played in setting project priorities under the current transportation legislation. The authors conclude that metropolitan-level decisionmaking generates a distinctly different set of priorities than found at either the state or local level, and that the role of MPOs should be considered carefully when reauthorization of ISTEA takes place in Washington later this year.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, to be quoted without written permission, provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. Foreword The reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) in 1997 raises three issues of great importance to California—how many dollars will the state receive from future transportation programs? Who will pay the cost? And what level of government will distribute the benefits? In this report, Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California, Paul Lewis and Mary Sprague focus on the third issue—the role metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) have played in setting project priorities under the current transportation legislation. The authors conclude that metropolitan-level decisionmaking generates a distinctly different set of priorities than found at either the state or local level, and that the role of MPOs should be considered carefully when reauthorization of ISTEA takes place in Washington later this year.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Transportation planning, Business, Public administration, Environmental planning, Regional science, Transport engineering, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Federal Transportation Policy and the Role of Metropolitan Planning Organizations in California — Research Paper | ScholarLens