1984Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

TRANSIT ADVISORY OFFICE: AN APPROACH TO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN A DECENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENT

Patricia Van Matre, Alan E Patashnick, Kristine D Beatty

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Historically, in Los Angeles County, transportation planning has taken place at the regional or subregional level. This situation was dramatically changed in July 1982 when the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) began allocating transit funds directly to cities as a result of a 1/2 cent increase in the county sales tax for public transit. Because responsibilities for transportation planning in the Los Angeles area had been centralized, there was little transportation planning expertise at the local level. To assist cities in transportation planning, the LACTC established the Transit Advisory Office. An approach to technical assistance developed by the LACTC during the first year of a 2-year grant funded by UMTA's Office of Service and Management Demonstrations is outlined. In the initial year of the program, the LACTC found that the highest demand was for the services of information provider and impartial mediator or facilitator. Major problems encountered included lack of communication between elected officials and city staff, a tendency toward overly ambitious projects, and a general apathy toward transit in some cities

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historically, in Los Angeles County, transportation planning has taken place at the regional or subregional level. This situation was dramatically changed in July 1982 when the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) began allocating transit funds directly to cities as a result of a 1/2 cent increase in the county sales tax for public transit. Because responsibilities for transportation planning in the Los Angeles area had been centralized, there was little transportation planning expertise at the local level. To assist cities in transportation planning, the LACTC established the Transit Advisory Office. An approach to technical assistance developed by the LACTC during the first year of a 2-year grant funded by UMTA's Office of Service and Management Demonstrations is outlined. In the initial year of the program, the LACTC found that the highest demand was for the services of information provider and impartial mediator or facilitator. Major problems encountered included lack of communication between elected officials and city staff, a tendency toward overly ambitious projects, and a general apathy toward transit in some cities

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historically, in Los Angeles County, transportation planning has taken place at the regional or subregional level. This situation was dramatically changed in July 1982 when the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) began allocating transit funds directly to cities as a result of a 1/2 cent increase in the county sales tax for public transit. Because responsibilities for transportation planning in the Los Angeles area had been centralized, there was little transportation planning expertise at the local level. To assist cities in transportation planning, the LACTC established the Transit Advisory Office. An approach to technical assistance developed by the LACTC during the first year of a 2-year grant funded by UMTA's Office of Service and Management Demonstrations is outlined. In the initial year of the program, the LACTC found that the highest demand was for the services of information provider and impartial mediator or facilitator. Major problems encountered included lack of communication between elected officials and city staff, a tendency toward overly ambitious projects, and a general apathy toward transit in some cities

Key concepts: Facilitator, Public transport, Transportation planning, Business, Commission, Transit (satellite), Transport engineering, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TRANSIT ADVISORY OFFICE: AN APPROACH TO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN A DECENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens