2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Translation Equivalence and the Reader's Response

Ziyan Xu

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The comparison of texts in different languages inevitably involves a theory of equivalence. Equivalence has been one of the central issues in translation although its definition, relevance, and applicability within the field of translation theory have caused heated controversy. In an effort to explore translation equivalence in terms of the reader’s response, this thesis intends to obtain a plausible account of theories and application regarding translation equivalence and other related fields. I propose that the reader’s response is the best answer embracing perspectives of recent developments in translation study in a wide communicative and cognitive frame of reference. Some of today’s most important theories on translation equivalence regarding the reader’s response will be presented. Then I will propose and elaborate on a more comprehensive model of translation equivalence, followed by detailed practice, analysis and discussion of selected literary works of translation between the Chinese and the English languages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The comparison of texts in different languages inevitably involves a theory of equivalence. Equivalence has been one of the central issues in translation although its definition, relevance, and applicability within the field of translation theory have caused heated controversy. In an effort to explore translation equivalence in terms of the reader’s response, this thesis intends to obtain a plausible account of theories and application regarding translation equivalence and other related fields. I propose that the reader’s response is the best answer embracing perspectives of recent developments in translation study in a wide communicative and cognitive frame of reference. Some of today’s most important theories on translation equivalence regarding the reader’s response will be presented. Then I will propose and elaborate on a more comprehensive model of translation equivalence, followed by detailed practice, analysis and discussion of selected literary works of translation between the Chinese and the English languages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The comparison of texts in different languages inevitably involves a theory of equivalence. Equivalence has been one of the central issues in translation although its definition, relevance, and applicability within the field of translation theory have caused heated controversy. In an effort to explore translation equivalence in terms of the reader’s response, this thesis intends to obtain a plausible account of theories and application regarding translation equivalence and other related fields. I propose that the reader’s response is the best answer embracing perspectives of recent developments in translation study in a wide communicative and cognitive frame of reference. Some of today’s most important theories on translation equivalence regarding the reader’s response will be presented. Then I will propose and elaborate on a more comprehensive model of translation equivalence, followed by detailed practice, analysis and discussion of selected literary works of translation between the Chinese and the English languages.

Key concepts: Dynamic and formal equivalence, Equivalence (formal languages), Translation studies, Computer science, Translation (biology), Logical equivalence, Linguistics, Target text

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Translation Equivalence and the Reader's Response — Research Paper | ScholarLens