1985Energy User News; (United States)Requires access

Coal boilers picked over gas despite $700K cost premium

J. Barber

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

St. Vincent College in Pennsylvania is paying a $700,000 cost premium to install coal-fired instead of natural gas-fired boilers because local costs of coal are one-third the costs of gas. The two boilers should save the school $145,000 a year more than gas boilers, and will give a five-year payback for the $1.5 million investment. A cost analysis showed that coal boilers could give a 78-79% efficiency for $103,000 in annual fuel costs, while the same performance using gas would cost $250,000. The higher capital cost for coal-fired boilers is partly due to the additional equipment and operating personnel required for solid fuel systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

St. Vincent College in Pennsylvania is paying a $700,000 cost premium to install coal-fired instead of natural gas-fired boilers because local costs of coal are one-third the costs of gas. The two boilers should save the school $145,000 a year more than gas boilers, and will give a five-year payback for the $1.5 million investment. A cost analysis showed that coal boilers could give a 78-79% efficiency for $103,000 in annual fuel costs, while the same performance using gas would cost $250,000. The higher capital cost for coal-fired boilers is partly due to the additional equipment and operating personnel required for solid fuel systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

St. Vincent College in Pennsylvania is paying a $700,000 cost premium to install coal-fired instead of natural gas-fired boilers because local costs of coal are one-third the costs of gas. The two boilers should save the school $145,000 a year more than gas boilers, and will give a five-year payback for the $1.5 million investment. A cost analysis showed that coal boilers could give a 78-79% efficiency for $103,000 in annual fuel costs, while the same performance using gas would cost $250,000. The higher capital cost for coal-fired boilers is partly due to the additional equipment and operating personnel required for solid fuel systems.

Key concepts: Coal, Waste management, Natural gas, Capital cost, Payback period, Operating cost, Fuel gas, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coal boilers picked over gas despite $700K cost premium — Research Paper | ScholarLens