2004Journal of the Medical Association of ThailandRequires access

Meshed Skin Graft versus Split Thickness Skin Graft in Diabetic Ulcer Coverage

PaisarnPuttirutvong

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Objective : To compare results of skin graft healing in diabetic ulcers between the meshed skin graft method and split thickness skin graft method. Duration of complete skin graft healing in both groups was recorded. The relations between ulcer size and complete skin graft healing duration were analyzed. Patients and Method : This research used a prospective randomized controlled study with 80 diabetic ulcer patients from January 2002 -June 2003. Thirty-eight cases were treated by the meshed skin graft method with expansion ratio I : 3 and another 42 cases were treated with the ordinary split- thickness skin. Results: The means of complete healing duration were 19.84 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.37 days in the meshed skin group and 20.36 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.21 days in the normal split-thickness skin graft group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in duration of complete graft healing and efficacy of treat- ment. The cosmetic result was accepted in both skin graft methods. There was no statistically signifi- cant difference between wound size and complete skin graft healing duration. Conclusion : The meshed skin graft method is as good for diabetic ulcer coverage as the ordinary split thickness skin graft. Key word : Meshed Skin Graft, Split Thickness Skin Graft, Skin Graft Healing, Wound Size

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective : To compare results of skin graft healing in diabetic ulcers between the meshed skin graft method and split thickness skin graft method. Duration of complete skin graft healing in both groups was recorded. The relations between ulcer size and complete skin graft healing duration were analyzed. Patients and Method : This research used a prospective randomized controlled study with 80 diabetic ulcer patients from January 2002 -June 2003. Thirty-eight cases were treated by the meshed skin graft method with expansion ratio I : 3 and another 42 cases were treated with the ordinary split- thickness skin. Results: The means of complete healing duration were 19.84 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.37 days in the meshed skin group and 20.36 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.21 days in the normal split-thickness skin graft group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in duration of complete graft healing and efficacy of treat- ment. The cosmetic result was accepted in both skin graft methods. There was no statistically signifi- cant difference between wound size and complete skin graft healing duration. Conclusion : The meshed skin graft method is as good for diabetic ulcer coverage as the ordinary split thickness skin graft. Key word : Meshed Skin Graft, Split Thickness Skin Graft, Skin Graft Healing, Wound Size

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective : To compare results of skin graft healing in diabetic ulcers between the meshed skin graft method and split thickness skin graft method. Duration of complete skin graft healing in both groups was recorded. The relations between ulcer size and complete skin graft healing duration were analyzed. Patients and Method : This research used a prospective randomized controlled study with 80 diabetic ulcer patients from January 2002 -June 2003. Thirty-eight cases were treated by the meshed skin graft method with expansion ratio I : 3 and another 42 cases were treated with the ordinary split- thickness skin. Results: The means of complete healing duration were 19.84 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.37 days in the meshed skin group and 20.36 a¹€a¸˜â€˜ 7.21 days in the normal split-thickness skin graft group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in duration of complete graft healing and efficacy of treat- ment. The cosmetic result was accepted in both skin graft methods. There was no statistically signifi- cant difference between wound size and complete skin graft healing duration. Conclusion : The meshed skin graft method is as good for diabetic ulcer coverage as the ordinary split thickness skin graft. Key word : Meshed Skin Graft, Split Thickness Skin Graft, Skin Graft Healing, Wound Size

Key concepts: Medicine, Split thickness skin graft, Surgery, Significant difference, Wound healing, Dermatology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meshed Skin Graft versus Split Thickness Skin Graft in Diabetic Ulcer Coverage — Research Paper | ScholarLens