1989World Conference on Engineering Education for Advancing Technology: Preprints of PapersRequires access

In Search of a Philosophy of Engineering

SF Johnston, RE Fourikis, HM Dietrich, JP Gostelow

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The authors argue that a satisfactory philosophy of engineering is important for the future development of the engineering profession in Australia. It would provide a basis for developing curricula, management of change and technology policy formulation. Such a philosophy would be quite different from a philosophy of science. The authors discuss the differences between science, engineering science, technology and engineering, and their roles in the process of innovation. The heuristic approach is seen as the basic methodology of engineering design, the central engineering activity. Clearer understanding of these matters has the potential for improving community understanding of the contributions the engineering profession has to make to advancing technology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors argue that a satisfactory philosophy of engineering is important for the future development of the engineering profession in Australia. It would provide a basis for developing curricula, management of change and technology policy formulation. Such a philosophy would be quite different from a philosophy of science. The authors discuss the differences between science, engineering science, technology and engineering, and their roles in the process of innovation. The heuristic approach is seen as the basic methodology of engineering design, the central engineering activity. Clearer understanding of these matters has the potential for improving community understanding of the contributions the engineering profession has to make to advancing technology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors argue that a satisfactory philosophy of engineering is important for the future development of the engineering profession in Australia. It would provide a basis for developing curricula, management of change and technology policy formulation. Such a philosophy would be quite different from a philosophy of science. The authors discuss the differences between science, engineering science, technology and engineering, and their roles in the process of innovation. The heuristic approach is seen as the basic methodology of engineering design, the central engineering activity. Clearer understanding of these matters has the potential for improving community understanding of the contributions the engineering profession has to make to advancing technology.

Key concepts: Biological systems engineering, Philosophy of science, Engineering ethics, Health systems engineering, Philosophy of computer science, Applied engineering, Engineering design process, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Search of a Philosophy of Engineering — Research Paper | ScholarLens